IISPPR

The Rise of Public Executions in North Korea: A Grim Reality

By Harini Vallal J The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) or North Korea has been an authoritarian state for 70 years, led by the Kim family.[1] It is ruled by one of the world’s longest-standing dynastic dictatorships.[2] Human rights are severely restricted in the country.[3] There is no free expression, religion, or movement. The country uses the Songbun system to categorise people based on their perceived political loyalty and family background.[4] The government maintains a tight grip on its citizens through a variety of means, including public executions, which aids in the maintenance of power by discouraging descent and instilling loyalty. Recently, there has been a noticeable increase in the frequency of these public executions, raising concerns among international observers and human rights organizations. This article will explore the rise of public executions in North Korea, examining the historical context, recent trends, and global reactions. In its early days, the state employed the death penalty to consolidate its control, but it has since evolved into a tool for crushing dissent and imposing stringent communist values. North Korea asserts that public executions are not carried out, and that the primary purpose of the death penalty is deterrence.[5] However, the reports reflect a different story. According to new research, nearly 1,400 North Koreans were publicly executed between 2000 and 2013, with the number reaching a high of 160 in 2009.[6] According to a Human Rights Watch study, the government periodically publicly kills civilians for stealing state property, hoarding food, and other “anti-socialist” crimes.[7] Political offences such as dissent, defection attempts, and following South Korean media are allegedly widespread. Economic crimes including smuggling and black market activities can also carry the death penalty, often served publicly. Executions are often carried out in front of large crowds, including young children. According to a recent report issued by the South Korean Ministry of Unification, public executions in North Korea are becoming more common. In 2022, a 22-year-old was executed in South Hwanghae province. His only transgression was to listen to 70 South Korean songs and share three films.[8] Furthermore, they have conducted public executions for breaking the country’s COVID-19 legislation. However, the government appears to have taken attempts to minimise the number of executions during the peak of the COVID-19 epidemic in order to prevent infection spread. However, now that the pandemic has reduced, the number of public executions has increased. Prior to the COVID-19 outbreak, North Korea had an annual average of roughly 10 public executions, but over the last year, this figure has risen to an estimated 100 or more.[9] In one example, almost 20,000 locals were compelled to attend to see an execution at the Hyesan Airfield. Furthermore, there have been cases of teenagers and pregnant women facing execution.[10] Despite all of these examples and accounts, the authorities claim that public executions are clearly prohibited by a Ministry of Public Security regulation. The head of Kangwon Province’s provincial court similarly asserts that there are no designated execution grounds in his province and that the location of execution is decided by the authorities and is undisclosed to the general public.[11] The official narrative presents individuals executed as traitors or serious criminals whose acts jeopardise national security and public safety. State-controlled media portrays a reasonable punishment, confirming the regime’s dominance and the repercussions of noncompliance. However, as international criticism has increased, studies indicate that the leadership is paying more attention to human rights issues, but this does not imply that the human rights situation is improving. It’s just done clandestinely. The government has progressively avoided carrying out executions in densely populated residential areas, where authorities struggled to keep track of individuals present, as well as holding executions near its borders and at facilities that can be easily observed by satellites.[12] The Transitional Justice Working Group (TJWG) discovered that almost all of the reported state-sanctioned killings were public executions by firing squad. They also discovered that executions occur most frequently in areas such as “river banks, open spaces and fields, market places, hills/mountains, sports grounds, and school grounds.”[13] Witnesses, including children and young adults, are frequently forced to attend, in order to instil fear in the general population from an early age. The international community has strongly denounced North Korea’s public executions. Human rights organisations such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch document these tragedies, emphasising the brutal character and psychological impact of executions on the populace. The United Nations General Assembly has voted numerous resolutions denouncing North Korea’s human rights record, which includes public executions. A 2014 UN Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in North Korea found that the regime engaged in egregious, systematic, and pervasive human rights violations such as extermination, murder, enslavement, torture, imprisonment, rape, forced abortions, and other forms of sexual violence. In November 2020, the UN General Assembly’s third committee unanimously endorsed a resolution denouncing North Korea’s human rights situation.[14] Despite these resolutions and the sanctions imposed for human rights violations, North Korea’s isolationist practices, such as strong censorship and the self-reliance philosophy known as Juche, allow it to resist foreign influence. In essence, the increase in public executions in North Korea is caused by a variety of variables. Internally, the administration aims to retain control and prevent dissent in the face of mounting discontent. Economic difficulties, worsened by international sanctions, have led to increasing crackdowns on activities such as smuggling and defection efforts, resulting in more executions. Furthermore, Kim Jong-un’s attempts to consolidate control and eliminate prospective threats have contributed to an increase in public executions. International condemnation remains high, but its impact is limited. The human cost of this heinous practice is apparent. As the world grapples with North Korea, tackling the issue remains a difficult task. [1] U.S. Department of State. (n.d.). U.S. Department of State. https://www.state.gov/reports/2018-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/democratic-peoples-republic-of-korea/ [2] Council on Foreign Relations. (n.d.). North Korea’s power structure. Council on Foreign Relations. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/north-koreas-power-structure [3] Human rights in North Korea. Amnesty International. (n.d.). https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/asia-and-the-pacific/east-asia/north-korea/report-korea-democratic-peoples-republic-of/ [4] The North Korean People’s challenges. The North Korean People’s Challenges.

Read More »

The psychological impact of dictatorship in a world of democracy. A brief look at authoritative regimes.

The impact of dictatorship or authoritative regimes on the mental health and overall psychology of individuals extremely depends on the history of the country and their people. I argue that countries that have a history of good leadership and good democracy, suffer more mentally if that very country falls under a dictatorship or authoritative regime, in contrast to countries with no history of good leadership or democracy, which have been under dictatorship for at least two generations. Often in authoritative regimes, rulers twist everything to their demands and needs. How they want the country to run, in their favour. Very often, in doing so, they also twist the minds of individuals, with propaganda, portraying themselves as gods, or supreme leaders, or in extreme cases, fear plays a bigger role in how people behave in a country, because of the regime they’re under. Similarly, with individuals living in closed dictatorship regimes, that have been running for at least two generations, how do the individuals feel, how is their mental health, and how do they react mentally, when they come in contact with a different country, a freer country compared to theirs?  In this analysis report, I have used two articles, one of which was on Egypt, its dictatorship, its unstable government and the psychology of individuals living in such a state. This is a report on refugees who have escaped from North Korea, a closed dictatorship country with high control and censorship over their citizens, seeking refuge in South Korea, and China. Elsayed, Yasser Abdel Razek wrote an article on ‘Gods never fall sick or die dictatorship and mental health in Egypt’ which emphasised and brought out a perspective on the mental health of individuals living in Egypt, a country that has seen other forms of government and regimes around them, and they have been under an unstable government for a long time. As per Elsayed, Yasser Abdel Razek, corruption, loot, unemployment, suppression of freedom of speech and various other means of suppression through which, citizens get frustrated. Which leads to them hoping to get rid of their leaders. When that doesn’t happen, they hope for them to pass on naturally, and die a natural death. But after years of going through the same torment, and regime, individuals start to view them as inevitable supreme leaders, losing hope for a better tomorrow. In such countries, the socioeconomic problem is also a big factor that affects everyone’s mental health, not just in such countries, but generally too. But specifically in such countries, hopelessness, vulnerability to disasters, vulnerability in general, insecurity, and risk of torture or hurt increase tremendously. Fustration rises to a level where citizens believe their leader can do anything. They see them as supreme leaders, as mentioned before. Another study, done by Woo-Teak Jeon, MD, corresponding author Shi-Eun Yu, MA, Young-A Cho, PhD, and Jin-Sup Eom, MA on Refuges who escaped from North Korea, refuging in South Korea and analysed their mental health. They were hoping from an extreme dictatorship country to breathe the air of the other side. The paper is titled ‘Traumatic Experiences and Mental Health of North Korean Refugees in South Korea’. Which studied the trauma and experiences of individuals who escaped. In such regimes, escaping is close to impossible, hence it is quite given that casualties and difficulties will be encountered. The research gave an idea of how that affected individuals, and how the regime affected them. Individuals were also given personality assessments, which revealed that they (refuged North Koreans) scored higher than the South Koreans. In gender comparison, men showed more alcohol problems and non-support to others. A study was conducted before this paper in the 2000s called the Hong’s Report. Which reported and analyzed individuals from North Korea, who escaped and entered China. This has been compared with this paper, and a few striking points have been made in them. Firstly, between 2006 and 2007, there was a weakening in social control by the government, shown by the progress in their life, without any big change. Secondly, it showed that over time, the trauma of escaping and even before, living in a dictator country, had reduced. But later, another study by Yu, in 2006, showed that the trauma levels have increased again. Perhaps we could see the slipping of the tight hold that the dictator had. Furthermore, through these studies, it is indicated that looking for mental health issues in North Koreans was wrong because they had nothing wrong with them. What’s interesting is that, after their escape, that’s when they developed mania and Schizophonia, after coming in contact with the outside world. Perhaps because of the huge cultural shock and the vast difference between North Korea to any other country. The research also mentioned, that men and women also portrayed very different behaviours, men being the more aggressive alcoholics who were provided no social support in North Korea, compared to women, who showed more depressive tendencies. Interestingly, the North Korean refugees also were given the warmth test. This test evaluates how warm, loving and caring an individual is, to how cold or dismissive they are. The scale gives a spectrum of interpersonal relationships. As it turns out, females in North, and South Korea, have more or less the same level of warmth that they show, compared to men, refugees in North Korea, portray more warmth than South Korean men. This shows, that even with less social support to men, they are still warm in their interpersonal relations, hospitable, as well as more readily acceptable to others. The North Korean refugees, find it hard to adjust to the much freer society that South Korea is. With trauma and living life under major control, it will take support and understanding from South Korea, to integrate them into their society. And so is the case with major dictatorship countries, where trauma and bad experiences leave a mark on individuals, who don’t have mental illness, but get one when they seek refugee in other countries, other

Read More »

The Military Regime and The Scare of Capital Punishment in Myanmar​

Introduction On July 25, 2022, the state of Myanmar carried out capital punishment after approximately three decades. According to the state-run newspaper ‘Global New Light of Myanmar’, four executions were carried out based on charges of terror activities. This included the execution of Phyo Zeya Thaw, a former member of Aung San Suu Kyi’s National League for Democracy (NLD), and prominent democracy activist Kyaw Min Yu. They were convicted and sentenced to death under the Anti-Terrorism Law, by a military tribunal in January for offenses involving explosives, bombings, and financing terrorism. According to Amnesty International, the charges are politically motivated. Additionally, Hla Myo Aung and Aung Thura Zaw were sentenced to death for the alleged murder of a woman believed to act as an informer for the military in Hlaing Tharyar in Yangon. Global Outrage and Condemnation !​ These instances of capital punishment led to worldwide outrage and condemnation. UN human rights chief Michelle Bachelet condemned the execution in the strongest terms and said, “I am dismayed that despite appeals from across the world, the military conducted these executions with no regard for human rights. This cruel and regressive step is an extension of the military’s ongoing repressive campaign against its people.”Countries like France and Japan also criticized the decision of Myanmar’s Military Junta while the US national security council described the killings as “heinous”. International organizations such as Amnesty International came out strongly against the act of Myanmar’s Military-led Government. Amnesty International’s Regional Director Erwin van der Borght said, “These executions amount to arbitrary deprivation of lives and are another example of Myanmar’s atrocious human rights record.”​ He further stated, “These executions – the first in Myanmar in decades – are cruel violations of the rights to life, liberty, and security of a person, and fair trial guarantees. For the military to widen its killing will only deepen its entanglement in the crisis it has itself created.” ​ Historical Context of Myanmar’s Military Regime !​ The political history of Myanmar under the military regime is marked by widespread violence. In 1962, the democratic structure of the country was overthrown by a military coup led by General Ne Win, who remained in power for 26 years. Following the collapse of Myanmar’s economy, public uprisings demanding democracy, and the emergence of a black market economy, the military regime launched a massive crackdown in 1988 which led to the death of more than 3000 civilians and the displacement of a large number of people.​ Recent Developments and Ongoing Conflict !​ The military rule continued over the years, and so did the violence. The year 2011 witnessed a breakthrough. The military junta was dissolved after years of widespread protests, and a military-dominated parliament was set up headed by former army bureaucrat and Prime Minister Thein. In 2015, Myanmar held its first nationwide, multiparty elections. The NLD led by Aung San Suu Kyi registered a landslide victory. However, for most of its existence, Myanmar remained in a state of conflict, both military and ethnic.​ In February 2021, the civilian government in the country was brought down by a coup headed by General Min Aung Hlaing, commander-in-chief of the Tatmadaw. Since then, a state of emergency has been imposed in the country. The government has promised to conduct free and fair elections. However, the country is engulfed in a new wave of violence. According to the advocacy group Assistance Association for Political Prisoners (AAPP) in Burma, 14,847 people have been arrested since the coup, while 11,759 remain in detention. 76 prisoners have been sentenced to death since the coup, including two children and 1 person, who have been sentenced to death in absentia.​ The Resurgence of Capital Punishment !​ Despite the ongoing conflict, the recent instances of capital punishment sparked worldwide concern. The executions are the first to be carried out in Myanmar since the 1980s. The Myanmar military issued a Martial Law Order 3/2021, according to which the authority to try civilians is transferred to special or existing military tribunals without any right to appeal. Amnesty International has also shown concern due to the dangerous increase in the use of the death penalty in Myanmar, as a tool to stop or minimize the ongoing agitation.​ Global Perspective on Capital Punishment !​ According to the US-based Death Penalty Information Center, “More than 70% of the countries in the world have abolished capital punishment in law and practice.” According to the “UN RESOLUTION FOR A UNIVERSAL MORATORIUM ON THE USE OF THE DEATH PENALTY” the UN reaffirms that the application of the death penalty violates human dignity and “calls upon all States that still maintain it to establish a moratorium on executions”. In 2020, the resolution was strengthened and stressed better conduct of the death row prisoners, and protecting women and children. It recognized the role of Civil Society “in pursuing local and national debates and regional initiatives on the death penalty”. 123 countries voted in its favor.​ However, unlike most of the world where capital punishment is not used and the trials are conducted in a comparatively fair manner, in Myanmar, under the Military Junta, there is no legal machinery and transparency for the protection of rights and people. As a result, they face a constant threat to their lives and rights.​ Human Rights Violations !​ The situation in Myanmar is a matter of grave concern. The relatives of those who were executed were deprived of any information and were kept waiting. The mother of Zayar Thaw said she was not aware when precisely her son would be executed, and thus was unable to make proper traditional funeral plans. “When we met on Zoom last Friday, my son was healthy and smiling. He asked me to send his reading glasses, dictionary, and some money to use in prison, so I brought those things to the prison today. That’s why I didn’t think they would kill him. I didn’t believe it”, she said. Similar stories could be heard from the relatives of the executed.​ Conclusion​

Read More »