Skip to main content

IISPPR

Category: International Relations

International Relations
Yasheeta Sulakhe Yasheeta

Foreign Policy Similarity Index 2000-2020

This project looks at how similarly countries voted in the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA). The main idea was to use voting data as a simple way of comparing countries instead of trying to compare their complete foreign policies. If two countries often vote in the same direction on the same resolutions, their voting similarity should be higher.
The project used United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) voting data from 2000 to 2020. After preparing the data, we represented YES as +1, NO as -1, and ABSTAIN as 0. We excluded NON-VOTING when comparing country pairs. We then calculated a score called the Foreign Policy Similarity Index (FPSI) for country pairs. This Foreign Policy Similarity Index (FPSI) measures similarity in United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) voting behavior rather than overall foreign-policy alignment.
The final data contained 323,066 voting records from 1,682 resolutions and 195 countries. After retaining country pairs with at least 100 comparable votes, 18,874 pairs remained. We also used the Foreign Policy Similarity Index (FPSI) matrix to cluster the data. We obtained four clusters from 162 countries with complete relationships, and the silhouette score was 0.6578. We ran a separate analysis of five country pairs to see how their scores changed over four time periods.
The results show clear differences between country pairs. Some countries have very similar voting patterns, while others differ much more. The Foreign Policy Similarity Index (FPSI) should be understood only as a measure of United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) voting similarity, not as a complete measure of foreign policy.

Read More »
International Relations
Arunima Singh

GLOBALISING SOME WARS, MARGINALISING OTHERS: MEDIA FRAMING, GEOPOLITICAL POWER, AND POSTCOLONIAL HIERARCHIES IN THE VISIBILITY OF GLOBAL SOUTH CONFLICTS

Some wars dominate global headlines while others remain overlooked. This study examines how media framing, geopolitical interests and postcolonial hierarchies shape international attention, revealing why the scale of human suffering alone does not determine a conflict’s visibility.

Read More »
International Relations
Lusha Katkam

ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF THE ASEAN-INDIA TRADE IN GOODS AGREEMENT (AITIGA) ON INDIA-ASEAN TRADE VOLUMES AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH

The study examines how AITIGA has influenced India–ASEAN trade and its broader economic implications. While trade increased after the agreement, imports grew faster than exports, widening the trade deficit. The findings suggest that stronger trade facilitation, export competitiveness, value addition, and domestic productivity are essential for translating trade integration into wider economic benefits.

Read More »
International Relations
vanshi maini

International Trade Agreements and Trade Volumes: Influence on the Economic Growth of Countries

Do trade agreements make countries grow faster? This study of ASEAN-6, USMCA and EU economies finds that trade openness alone is a weak predictor of GDP growth (r = 0.205, R² = 0.042). Trade agreements and rising trade volumes act as enabling conditions, not automatic drivers. Their benefits depend on a country’s development stage, institutions and wider economic conditions.

Read More »
International Relations
Mriganko Majumder

Identifying Emerging Geopolitical Alliances through network analysis of UN Voting Patterns.

This study examines whether patterns of United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) voting can reveal emerging forms of diplomatic alignment in an increasingly multipolar international system. It focuses on India as a key case, given its strategic autonomy and engagement with both Western and non-Western states. The research also investigates whether similarities in climate-related priorities, particularly those associated with Sustainable Development Goal 13 (SDG 13), correspond with similarities in UNGA voting behaviour. Drawing on liberal institutionalism and constructivism, the study explores how cooperation, norms, identities, and strategic interests shape state behaviour. Using systematic literature review, documentary analysis, comparative analysis, and Social Network Analysis, the research identifies voting clusters and patterns of diplomatic proximity. It recognises that voting similarity does not necessarily indicate formal alliances, but may reflect broader patterns of cooperation and alignment in contemporary international relations.

Read More »