Author: Vani Bhat

Abstract

China–Africa relations have evolved from a foundation of political solidarity during the post-colonial era into one of the most significant strategic economic partnerships in the contemporary Global South. This study examines the historical evolution of these relations from 1949 to the present, analysing how successive phases of China’s foreign and economic policy have shaped trade, investment, infrastructure development, industrialisation, and broader economic cooperation across Africa. Adopting a historical and analytical approach, the paper traces the transition from ideological cooperation under Mao Zedong to commercial engagement under Deng Xiaoping, institutionalised partnership through the Forum on China–Africa Cooperation (FOCAC), and strategic integration under Xi Jinping’s Belt and Road Initiative. The findings indicate that Chinese engagement has contributed substantially to Africa’s infrastructure development, trade expansion, employment creation, and industrial growth while also presenting challenges related to trade imbalances, value addition, debt sustainability, and technology transfer. The study argues that China–Africa relations cannot be adequately understood through simplistic narratives of either neo-colonialism or development partnership. Instead, the relationship reflects a dynamic and evolving partnership shaped by the changing priorities of both China and African states. Ultimately, the paper concludes that the long-term success of this partnership will depend on Africa’s ability to strengthen domestic industrial capacity, diversify exports, and capture greater value from its natural resources while continuing to engage strategically with China’s evolving economic agenda.

INTRODUCTION

The decades following the Second World War marked a period of profound political transformation across Africa. Beginning in the late 1950s and accelerating throughout the 1960s, newly independent African states inherited political sovereignty alongside significant economic challenges, including weak industrial bases, limited infrastructure, and heavy dependence on commodity exports (Herbst, 2000). During the same period, China was navigating its own developmental trajectory, seeking to establish diplomatic relationships with newly independent states while defining its role within a rapidly changing international order (Alden, 2007; Brautigam, 2009).

Six decades later, that relationship has evolved into one of the defining economic partnerships of the twenty-first century. China has become Africa’s largest bilateral trading partner, a leading source of infrastructure finance, and an increasingly important investor across sectors ranging from transport and energy to manufacturing and digital technology (African Development Bank, 2024; Boston University Global Development Policy Center, 2025).

Despite the rapid expansion of China–Africa economic relations, academic debate remains divided regarding the long-term developmental implications of this partnership. While existing scholarship has largely examined China–Africa relations through the lenses of South–South cooperation, development finance, dependency theory, debt sustainability, and neo-colonialism, comparatively less attention has been given to examining how the evolution of China’s economic strategy has shaped the economic outcomes of the China–Africa partnership over time (Alden, 2007; Brautigam, 2009; Taylor, 2006).

This paper examines the historical evolution of China–Africa economic relations from the era of political solidarity to the contemporary period of strategic economic partnership. By tracing the changing objectives, instruments, and outcomes of this relationship, the study seeks to analyse how successive phases of engagement have influenced Africa’s economic development and China’s broader economic strategy.

By examining the evolution of this partnership and its economic outcomes, the study seeks to contribute to a more nuanced understanding of China–Africa economic relations and provide insights into the opportunities and challenges that may shape future cooperation.

Methodology

This study adopts a qualitative historical-analytical research design based on an extensive review of secondary sources. Rather than collecting primary data, the research synthesises existing academic literature, policy reports, institutional publications, and historical records to examine the evolution of China–Africa economic relations from 1949 to the present.

The study draws upon peer-reviewed books and journal articles, reports published by organisations such as the The African Development Bank (AfDB), the Boston University Global Development Policy Center, the Forum on China–Africa Cooperation (FOCAC), and other credible institutional sources. These materials were selected based on their academic relevance, credibility, and contribution to understanding the historical development of China–Africa relations.

A chronological analytical approach was employed to divide the relationship into four major phases: Political Solidarity (1949–1978), Economic Reform and Commercial Engagement (1978–1999), Institutionalised Economic Partnership (2000–2012), and Strategic Economic Integration (2013–present). Each phase was examined in terms of China’s evolving foreign and economic objectives, the mechanisms of engagement, and their implications for Africa’s economic development.

Rather than testing a specific hypothesis, the study adopts an interpretive approach that compares differing scholarly perspectives on themes such as South–South cooperation, development finance, dependency theory, infrastructure development, and strategic partnership. By integrating these perspectives within a single historical framework, the research provides a comprehensive understanding of how China’s changing economic strategy has shaped the trajectory of China–Africa economic relations over time.

2. Literature Review

2.1 Historical Perspectives on China–Africa Relations

The expansion of China–Africa relations has generated extensive academic interest, particularly concerning the historical motivations that shaped China’s engagement with the African continent. Much of the early scholarship agrees that the relationship emerged within the broader context of African decolonisation and Cold War geopolitics. Rather than being primarily driven by commercial interests, China’s foreign policy during the Mao Zedong era centred on the principles of Third World solidarity and South–South cooperation, aiming to establish diplomatic partnerships with newly independent African states while positioning China as an alternative development partner outside the dominant Western and Soviet spheres of influence (Brautigam, 2009; Alden, 2007).

Studies examining this period frequently identify the deployment of Chinese Medical Teams, agricultural demonstration projects, technical cooperation programmes, and the construction of the Tanzania–Zambia Railway (TAZARA) as defining features of China’s early engagement. Brautigam (2009) argues that these initiatives reflected China’s commitment to political solidarity and development cooperation rather than immediate commercial gain. Similarly, Alden (2007) suggests that China’s support for African liberation movements and state-building efforts was closely linked to its broader diplomatic objective of strengthening political alliances across the developing world.

Scholars generally agree that this ideological phase gradually evolved following the introduction of Reform and Opening-Up under Deng Xiaoping in 1978. As China’s domestic priorities shifted towards economic modernisation, its external engagement increasingly incorporated commercial considerations alongside diplomatic objectives. This transition marked the beginning of a more pragmatic phase in China–Africa economic relations, laying the institutional foundations for deeper trade and investment cooperation during the following decades (Brautigam, 2009; Alden, 2007).

2.2 Contemporary Perspectives on China’s Economic Engagement

Contemporary scholarship largely examines China–Africa relations through the interconnected themes of trade, infrastructure investment, development finance, industrialisation, and economic cooperation. Many researchers identify the Going Out Strategy, China’s accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO), and the establishment of the Forum on China–Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) in 2000 as critical turning points that transformed China from a development partner into Africa’s largest bilateral trading partner (Brautigam, 2009; Alden, 2007).

Institutional research conducted by organisations such as the World Bank, the African Development Bank (AfDB), and the Boston University Global Development Policy Center generally presents China’s economic engagement as a significant contributor to Africa’s infrastructure development. These studies highlight improvements in transport corridors, electricity generation, telecommunications, industrial parks, and manufacturing capacity, arguing that Chinese financing has addressed longstanding infrastructure deficits that traditional development partners were often unwilling or unable to finance. Recent research further suggests that China’s overseas economic strategy is evolving from large-scale sovereign lending towards commercially sustainable investment, public-private partnerships, digital infrastructure, renewable energy, and cooperation in critical mineral supply chains, reflecting both China’s domestic economic transformation and the changing priorities of African governments (Boston University Global Development Policy Center, 2025; African Development Bank, 2024).

However, not all scholars interpret these developments in the same manner. Ian Taylor argues that while China’s engagement differs from traditional Western models of development assistance, it nevertheless reproduces structural inequalities within the global economy by reinforcing Africa’s continued dependence on the export of primary commodities. According to Taylor (2006, 2009), the expansion of infrastructure and trade has not necessarily translated into broad-based industrialisation, as many African economies remain positioned primarily as suppliers of raw materials while importing higher-value manufactured products from China. From this perspective, the relationship reflects elements of structural dependency despite its distinct institutional characteristics.

2.3 Competing Perspectives and Research Gap

The differing interpretations presented within the literature illustrate the complexity of evaluating China–Africa economic relations. Earlier scholarship frequently framed China’s growing presence through concepts such as neo-colonialism, dependency theory, and debt-trap diplomacy, arguing that China’s infrastructure financing and resource-backed lending risked increasing African debt burdens while reinforcing commodity dependence (Taylor, 2006; Taylor, 2009).

More recent empirical research, however, challenges many of these assumptions. Brautigam (2009), drawing upon extensive field research, argues that the “debt-trap diplomacy” narrative lacks strong empirical support and overlooks the diversity of Chinese lending practices, debt restructuring mechanisms, and African governments’ capacity to negotiate investment agreements. Alden (2007) similarly emphasises African political agency, arguing that African governments actively pursue Chinese partnerships to advance their own development priorities rather than simply responding to Chinese strategic interests. Findings from the Boston University Global Development Policy Center further suggest that China’s overseas investment strategy is itself undergoing transformation, with increasing emphasis on commercially viable projects, strategic minerals, manufacturing, and lower-risk investments rather than indiscriminate sovereign lending (Boston University Global Development Policy Center, 2025).

Collectively, the existing literature demonstrates that China–Africa relations cannot be adequately understood through binary interpretations that portray China either as a purely developmental partner or as a neo-colonial actor. Instead, contemporary scholarship increasingly recognises the relationship as dynamic, evolving, and shaped by changing domestic priorities within China, the development strategies of African governments, and wider transformations in the international political economy (Brautigam, 2009; Alden, 2007).

Nevertheless, an important gap remains. While existing studies have examined China’s development finance, infrastructure investment, debt sustainability, trade relations, and geopolitical influence in considerable detail, these themes are frequently analysed in isolation or within specific historical periods. Comparatively fewer studies examine how China’s domestic economic transformation continuously reshaped its engagement with Africa across successive historical phases and how these shifts collectively influenced the broader trajectory of the China–Africa economic partnership.

Accordingly, this study adopts a historical and analytical perspective by tracing the evolution of China–Africa economic relations from the era of political solidarity to the contemporary period of strategic economic partnership. Rather than evaluating the relationship through predetermined normative frameworks, the study examines how the objectives, instruments, and economic outcomes of China’s engagement evolved over time. In doing so, it seeks to provide a more integrated understanding of the historical transformation of one of the most significant economic partnerships in the contemporary Global South.

Chapter 3: Evolution of China–Africa Economic Relations

The evolution of China–Africa economic relations cannot be understood without considering the historical circumstances under which the partnership first emerged. Following the establishment of the People’s Republic of China in 1949, Beijing found itself relatively isolated from much of the Western world due to ideological divisions that characterised the Cold War (Alden, 2007; Brautigam, 2009). At the same time, the wave of decolonisation sweeping across Africa during the late 1950s and 1960s brought dozens of newly independent states into the international system, each confronting the challenges of nation-building, economic development, and diplomatic recognition (Herbst, 2000; Meredith, 2011). These parallel developments created an opportunity for China and African states to establish relationships based on shared developmental aspirations and mutual political interests (Alden, 2007). Although the character of this relationship would evolve significantly over subsequent decades, its foundations were laid during this formative period of political solidarity and South–South cooperation (Brautigam, 2009). The earliest phase of China–Africa relations was therefore characterised less by commercial exchange than by political solidarity, development assistance, and diplomatic cooperation, establishing the foundations upon which subsequent economic engagement would be built (Brautigam, 2009; Alden, 2007).

3.1 Political Solidarity and South–South Cooperation (1949–1978)

The first phase of China–Africa relations emerged during a period of significant political change for both China and the African continent. Following the establishment of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in 1949, China found itself increasingly isolated from much of the Western world due to ideological divisions that characterised the Cold War. The deterioration of Sino–Soviet relations during the late 1950s further deepened China’s diplomatic isolation, encouraging Beijing to expand its relations beyond the traditional power blocs and strengthen ties with newly independent countries across the developing world (Alden, 2007; Brautigam, 2009). At almost the same time, Africa was experiencing a wave of decolonisation, with many countries gaining independence from European colonial powers and beginning the difficult process of nation-building and economic development (Herbst, 2000; Meredith, 2011). These parallel developments created favourable conditions for China and African states to establish closer diplomatic relations based on shared political interests and common developmental aspirations (Brautigam, 2009).

Although China and African states had different historical experiences, both shared strong anti-imperialist and anti-colonial sentiments. While many African nations had endured decades of formal colonial rule, China had experienced foreign intervention, unequal treaties, and occupation by external powers during what is commonly referred to as the “Century of Humiliation.” This shared opposition to imperialism became one of the defining principles of China’s foreign policy towards Africa during the Mao Zedong era (Alden, 2007; Brautigam, 2009). Rather than presenting itself as another major power, China portrayed itself as a fellow developing country that understood the political and economic challenges facing newly independent nations. This approach allowed Beijing to position itself as an alternative partner to the Western powers, whose political and financial assistance was often viewed with caution by many post-colonial governments (Taylor, 2006; Alden, 2007).

An important milestone in strengthening these relations was the Bandung Conference of 1955, where representatives from Asian and African countries gathered to promote peaceful coexistence, anti-colonialism, and cooperation among newly independent states. The conference laid the ideological foundation for what later became known as South–South Cooperation, encouraging developing countries to collaborate through mutual respect, sovereignty, and non-interference rather than dependence on the major Cold War powers (Alden, 2007; Brautigam, 2009). For China, Bandung provided an important diplomatic platform to engage directly with African leaders and reinforce its commitment to supporting newly independent nations (Alden, 2007).

China’s commitment to these principles extended beyond diplomatic rhetoric and was reflected in practical assistance across the continent. During the 1960s and 1970s, China provided financial, military, and technical support to several African liberation movements that were still fighting against colonial rule, including those in Algeria, Angola, Mozambique, and Zimbabwe (Alden, 2007; Brautigam, 2009). For countries that had already gained independence, Chinese assistance focused on strengthening national development through practical cooperation. One of the earliest examples was the deployment of Chinese Medical Teams (CMTs), which began in Algeria in 1963 before expanding to other African countries. These medical teams provided healthcare services, established local clinics, trained medical personnel, and supported public health initiatives, particularly in rural areas where access to healthcare remained limited (Li, 2011; Brautigam, 2009). China also introduced agricultural demonstration farms and technical assistance programmes aimed at improving agricultural productivity and strengthening food security through low-cost and locally adaptable farming techniques (Brautigam, 2009).

Perhaps the most significant symbol of this early partnership was the construction of the Tanzania–Zambia Railway (TAZARA) during the early 1970s. Following Zambia’s independence, the country faced major challenges in exporting its copper because existing transport routes passed through Rhodesia and apartheid South Africa, both of which were under white minority rule. Although Zambia and Tanzania sought financial assistance from Western governments and the World Bank, the project failed to secure funding. China subsequently agreed to finance and construct the 1,860-kilometre railway through an interest-free loan while also providing engineers, technical expertise, and thousands of Chinese workers to assist in its construction (Monson, 2009; Brautigam, 2009). Beyond its economic importance, the TAZARA Railway became a powerful symbol of China–Africa cooperation, demonstrating China’s willingness to support African development at a time when many newly independent states faced limited external assistance (Monson, 2009).

China’s political and developmental engagement during this period also generated important diplomatic outcomes. In 1971, the adoption of United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758, which recognised the People’s Republic of China as the legitimate representative of China in the United Nations, received overwhelming support from African states (Alden, 2007). Reflecting on this moment, Mao Zedong famously remarked that it was “our African brothers who carried us into the United Nations.” This statement underscored the political trust and diplomatic goodwill that had developed between China and African countries during the previous two decades (Alden, 2007; Brautigam, 2009).

Overall, the Mao era established the political and diplomatic foundations of China–Africa relations. Economic interests played only a limited role during this period; instead, the relationship was largely shaped by anti-imperialist solidarity, diplomatic cooperation, and mutual support among developing nations (Brautigam, 2009; Alden, 2007). Although later phases of China–Africa relations became increasingly driven by trade, investment, and commercial interests, the trust and political partnerships developed during this period provided the foundation upon which the modern economic relationship would eventually be built (Brautigam, 2009).

3.2 Economic Reform and Commercial Engagement (1978–1999)

The political solidarity established during the Mao Zedong era laid the foundation for China–Africa relations. However, following Mao Zedong’s death in 1976, the relationship entered a new phase under the leadership of Deng Xiaoping. What had initially begun as an ideologically driven partnership gradually underwent a significant transformation as China’s domestic priorities changed. With the launch of the Reform and Opening-Up policy in 1978, China shifted its focus towards economic modernisation, industrial development, and integration into the global economy. As a result, China’s foreign policy also became increasingly pragmatic. While political relations with African countries continued to remain important, Beijing gradually moved away from relying primarily on subsidised foreign aid and instead began pursuing partnerships based on mutual economic cooperation and commercial engagement (Vogel, 2011; Brautigam, 2009; Alden, 2007).

This shift was largely driven by China’s own domestic transformation. As the country’s economy expanded, state-owned enterprises (SOEs) were encouraged to look beyond China’s borders for new commercial opportunities, overseas construction projects, and future export markets. Rather than viewing foreign policy solely as a means of promoting ideological solidarity, China increasingly used its international relationships to support domestic economic development. Africa, where China had already established decades of diplomatic goodwill during the Mao era, naturally became an important partner in this changing approach (Brautigam, 2009; Alden, 2007).

The first steps towards this new model of engagement were reflected in China’s growing participation in international economic institutions. China’s accession to the World Bank in 1980 and the African Development Bank (AfDB) in 1985 marked important milestones in this transition. Membership in these institutions enabled Chinese companies to participate in internationally funded infrastructure projects and compete for construction and engineering contracts across Africa. These developments gradually shifted China’s role from that of a development partner providing assistance to one that also actively participated in commercially driven projects throughout the continent (African Development Bank, n.d.; Brautigam, 2009).

Although development assistance continued during this period, the nature of China’s engagement became increasingly business-oriented. Financial assistance was no longer provided solely through grants; it was increasingly accompanied by commercial loans, engineering contracts, procurement agreements, and the growing presence of Chinese firms in African markets. Following the establishment of the China Civil Engineering Construction Corporation (CCECC) and other state-owned enterprises operating internationally, Chinese firms increasingly secured infrastructure contracts, construction projects, and investment opportunities throughout Africa. These developments marked the beginning of China’s transition from an aid-focused partner towards a commercially engaged economic actor (Brautigam, 2009; Alden, 2007).

During the 1980s and 1990s, Chinese SOEs gradually expanded their presence across resource-rich African economies by securing contracts in sectors such as transport infrastructure, construction, mining, and petroleum. While the scale of Chinese investment remained relatively modest compared to later decades, these activities established important commercial networks and institutional relationships that would subsequently facilitate much larger investments in the twenty-first century. China’s growing commercial presence during this period therefore represented less an end in itself than the groundwork for deeper economic cooperation in the years that followed (Brautigam, 2009; Alden, 2007).

Overall, the Deng Xiaoping era represented a significant turning point in the evolution of China–Africa economic relations. While the political goodwill established during the Mao period remained an important foundation, China’s engagement increasingly reflected commercial pragmatism and mutual economic interests. By encouraging overseas investment, expanding the international activities of Chinese enterprises, and integrating into global financial institutions, China laid the institutional and commercial foundations that would later support the large-scale trade, investment, and infrastructure partnerships developed during the Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao administrations (Vogel, 2011; Brautigam, 2009; Alden, 2007).

3.3 Institutionalised Economic Partnership (2000–2012)

The China–Africa economic relationship underwent its most significant transformation during the leadership of Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao, evolving from a relatively modest political and commercial partnership into a structured economic relationship centred on trade, infrastructure development, investment, and resource cooperation. While the Deng Xiaoping era had introduced economic pragmatism into China’s foreign policy, it was during this period that those ideas were translated into concrete policies and institutions. As China’s domestic economy experienced rapid industrialisation and manufacturing growth, the country’s demand for energy, raw materials, and new export markets expanded considerably. At the same time, many African countries continued to face significant infrastructure gaps and limited access to affordable development finance. These changing domestic and international conditions created an opportunity for both sides to deepen economic cooperation on a much larger scale (Brautigam, 2009; Alden, 2007).

Building upon the commercial foundations established during the Deng Xiaoping era, Jiang Zemin laid the groundwork for what would become modern China–Africa economic relations. Following the 1989 Tiananmen Square incident, China faced diplomatic isolation from many Western countries and sought to strengthen its relationships with developing nations, particularly across Africa. At the same time, Beijing recognised that sustaining China’s economic growth required greater access to overseas markets and strategic natural resources. This objective was reinforced through the “Going Out” (or “Going Global”) Strategy, which encouraged Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs) to invest abroad, undertake international construction projects, explore new consumer markets, and gradually secure the resources needed to support China’s expanding industrial economy. Africa, with its abundant natural resources and long-standing diplomatic relationship with China, became an increasingly important destination for this outward expansion (Brautigam, 2009; Alden, 2007; State Council of the People’s Republic of China, 2000).

An equally important development during Jiang Zemin’s leadership was the establishment of the Forum on China–Africa Cooperation (FOCAC). First proposed by Jiang and formally inaugurated at its inaugural ministerial conference in Beijing in 2000, FOCAC created the first structured and institutionalised framework for China–Africa relations. Rather than relying solely on bilateral agreements, the forum provided a regular platform through which China and African governments could coordinate economic policies, announce investment commitments, expand trade cooperation, and strengthen diplomatic engagement through meetings held every three years. The establishment of FOCAC marked a significant shift in the relationship, transforming China–Africa cooperation from a series of individual partnerships into a long-term institutional framework capable of supporting sustained economic collaboration (Forum on China–Africa Cooperation [FOCAC], 2000; Brautigam, 2009; Alden, 2007).

China’s accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001 further accelerated this transformation. Greater integration into the global trading system strengthened China’s export-oriented economy and significantly increased demand for oil, copper, iron ore, timber, and other strategic resources required to sustain its industrial expansion. As China’s manufacturing sector continued to grow, Africa became increasingly important not only as a source of essential raw materials but also as an emerging market for Chinese manufactured goods, construction services, and investment. The relationship was therefore no longer based primarily on political solidarity but increasingly reflected complementary economic interests (World Trade Organization, 2001; Brautigam, 2009).

The momentum established under Jiang Zemin was significantly expanded during the presidency of Hu Jintao, who carried these initiatives forward through larger financial commitments and deeper economic cooperation. One of the defining features of this period was the Angola Model, under which Chinese policy banks extended large-scale, low-interest, resource-backed loans to African governments for infrastructure development in exchange for long-term oil and mineral supply agreements. This model enabled African countries to finance roads, railways, power plants, hospitals, and other critical infrastructure while allowing China to secure reliable access to the natural resources required for its continued economic growth. Although the model has attracted both praise and criticism, it reflected a partnership in which both sides pursued their own economic priorities through long-term cooperation (Brautigam, 2009; Alden, 2007).

The institutional framework established through FOCAC also expanded considerably during Hu Jintao’s administration. At the 2006 Beijing Summit, China announced a series of major financial commitments, including US$5 billion in preferential loans and the creation of a US$1 billion China–Africa Development Fund to support investment and assist small and medium-sized African enterprises. Alongside these commitments, Chinese foreign direct investment (FDI) in Africa increased rapidly, with investment flows rising approximately thirty-fold between 2003 and 2011. These measures further strengthened China’s economic presence across the continent and encouraged greater participation by Chinese enterprises in sectors including infrastructure, manufacturing, telecommunications, mining, and energy (Brautigam, 2009; United Nations Conference on Trade and Development [UNCTAD], 2013).

The impact of these developments became increasingly visible through the rapid expansion of China–Africa trade. Bilateral trade grew from approximately US$10.6 billion in 2000 to US$166 billion by 2011, reflecting the unprecedented scale of economic engagement during this period. In 2009, China officially surpassed the United States to become Africa’s largest trading partner, demonstrating how the relationship had evolved beyond political cooperation into one of the most significant economic partnerships in the developing world (Brautigam, 2009; African Development Bank, 2011).

Overall, the Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao era transformed the nature of China–Africa relations. What had begun as political solidarity during the Mao era and gradually shifted towards commercial engagement under Deng Xiaoping now evolved into a comprehensive and institutionalised economic partnership. Through the Going Out Strategy, the establishment of FOCAC, expanding infrastructure finance, resource-backed investment models, and rapidly growing trade, this period laid the foundations for the even deeper strategic integration that would emerge under Xi Jinping (Brautigam, 2009; Alden, 2007).

3.4 Strategic Economic Integration (2013–Present)

China’s engagement with Africa underwent another significant transformation during the leadership of Xi Jinping, as the relationship evolved from a resource-for-infrastructure model into a more sophisticated framework characterised by strategic economic integration, technological cooperation, and long-term institutional alignment. This marked a clear departure from the volume-driven commercial expansion witnessed during the Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao administrations. Instead, China’s engagement increasingly reflected changing domestic priorities, global economic shifts, and the growing importance of Africa within China’s long-term development strategy (Naughton, 2021; Brautigam, 2009; Alden, 2007).

Under Xi Jinping, China’s domestic economic priorities gradually shifted from high-speed, export-led growth towards high-quality development, supported by the Dual Circulation Strategy. Rather than relying solely on labour-intensive manufacturing, China sought to move further up the global value chain by expanding industries centred on electric vehicles (EVs), lithium batteries, and solar photovoltaic technology—commonly referred to as the country’s “New Three” industries. At the same time, increasing trade tensions with the United States, higher tariffs on Chinese exports, and greater restrictions within several Western markets encouraged China to diversify both its overseas markets and supply chains. These developments reshaped Africa’s role within China’s broader economic strategy. The continent was no longer viewed solely as a source of raw materials but increasingly as a strategic partner that could provide critical minerals, emerging consumer markets, manufacturing opportunities, and greater integration into China’s global supply chains (Naughton, 2021; Boston University Global Development Policy Center, 2024).

A major step towards achieving these objectives came with the launch of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in 2013. Building upon the bilateral agreements established during previous administrations, the BRI provided a broader strategic framework through which infrastructure connectivity, trade facilitation, and investment could be coordinated under a single global initiative. Africa became an important node within this network, witnessing the development of large-scale projects including the Mombasa–Nairobi Standard Gauge Railway in Kenya, the expansion of the Doraleh Multipurpose Port in Djibouti, and deep-water port developments across several West African states. Beyond improving physical connectivity, these projects strengthened regional trade corridors and reinforced Africa’s position within China’s expanding international logistics network (National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, & Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China, 2015; FOCAC, 2021).

China’s engagement also extended beyond traditional infrastructure through the development of the Digital Silk Road, reflecting the growing importance of digital connectivity within modern economic development. As economic cooperation evolved alongside technological advancement, China increasingly invested in Africa’s telecommunications infrastructure through companies such as Huawei and ZTE. These firms played a leading role in constructing more than 70% of Africa’s 4G telecommunications networks, laying thousands of kilometres of fibre-optic cables, and supporting the establishment of national data centres across the continent. This represented an important shift in China’s approach, demonstrating that economic cooperation was no longer centred solely on roads, railways, and ports but increasingly incorporated digital infrastructure as a new pillar of development (Africa Center for Strategic Studies, 2024; Boston University Global Development Policy Center, 2024).

The accelerating global transition towards renewable energy further strengthened China’s economic engagement with Africa through growing demand for critical minerals. As China’s domestic industries expanded production of electric vehicles, batteries, and renewable energy technologies, securing reliable supplies of minerals such as cobalt, lithium, copper, and uranium became increasingly important. Chinese state-linked enterprises therefore expanded investments across resource-rich African countries, including cobalt and copper mining in the Democratic Republic of Congo, lithium projects in Zimbabwe, and uranium investments in Namibia. Rather than simply increasing imports of raw materials, Chinese investment increasingly focused on securing long-term positions within mining operations, processing facilities, and supply chains associated with these strategic resources. This reflected China’s broader objective of capturing greater value throughout the production chain required for its emerging green industries while simultaneously strengthening long-term economic cooperation with African partners (Boston University Global Development Policy Center, 2024; African Development Bank, 2024).

Alongside resource cooperation, China increasingly encouraged industrial development and local manufacturing within Africa. Investment expanded into industrial parks, manufacturing facilities, and assembly operations aimed at supporting greater value addition within African economies. This approach recognised that long-term economic cooperation required moving beyond the traditional export of raw commodities towards greater local production and industrial capacity. Although implementation has varied considerably across African countries, this shift reflected an evolving partnership that increasingly incorporated manufacturing and industrial cooperation alongside infrastructure development (Brautigam, 2009; United Nations Industrial Development Organization [UNIDO], 2022).

Another important development during the Xi Jinping era was China’s gradual shift away from large-scale sovereign lending towards what Beijing described as a “Small and Beautiful” approach. Following growing concerns regarding debt sustainability, slowing domestic economic growth, and repayment challenges experienced by several African countries, China reduced its reliance on multi-billion-dollar infrastructure loans. Instead, investment increasingly focused on commercially viable and targeted projects, including renewable energy, agricultural processing, telecommunications, healthcare, and smaller-scale infrastructure initiatives. This adjustment did not represent a withdrawal from Africa but rather a recalibration of China’s investment strategy towards projects considered more sustainable and economically resilient (Boston University Global Development Policy Center, 2024).

China further expanded economic cooperation through the introduction of its zero-tariff policy, which was extended on 1 May 2026 to 53 African countries maintaining diplomatic relations with Beijing. The initiative granted full tariff-free access for eligible African exports entering the Chinese market and sought to encourage greater exports of agricultural products, processed goods, and manufactured products alongside traditional resource exports. While many of Africa’s principal exports, particularly crude oil and several mineral commodities, had already enjoyed preferential market access, the policy signalled China’s broader intention to encourage greater value addition and manufacturing within African economies while expanding trade beyond primary commodities (Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China, 2025).

Overall, the Xi Jinping era represents the most comprehensive phase in the evolution of China–Africa economic relations. Building upon the political foundations established under Mao Zedong, the commercial reforms introduced by Deng Xiaoping, and the institutional expansion achieved during the Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao administrations, China and Africa developed a multidimensional economic partnership encompassing infrastructure, digital connectivity, industrial cooperation, strategic minerals, manufacturing, and expanded market access. Across seven decades, the relationship evolved from political solidarity to commercial engagement, from commercial engagement to institutionalised cooperation, and ultimately into a strategic economic partnership that continues to shape the economic trajectories of both China and the African continent (Brautigam, 2009; Alden, 2007; Boston University Global Development Policy Center, 2024).

4. Infrastructure Development

One of the most significant economic outcomes of the evolution of China–Africa economic relations has been the expansion of infrastructure across the African continent. While the partnership initially emerged from political solidarity during the Mao Zedong era, it gradually evolved into one driven by complementary economic needs. As China’s rapidly industrialising economy required stable access to crude oil, copper, cobalt, iron ore, and other strategic resources, many African countries required substantial financial resources, engineering expertise, and technical capacity to address decades of underinvestment in infrastructure. This mutual dependence enabled the development of a partnership in which China secured access to essential resources while African governments obtained capital and technical support to finance projects that were often beyond the reach of domestic budgets or traditional development assistance (Brautigam, 2009; Alden, 2007).

Through concessional financing, foreign direct investment, engineering contracts, and resource-backed agreements, China became one of Africa’s largest financiers of infrastructure development (Boston University Global Development Policy Center, 2024; African Development Bank, 2024). Chinese-supported projects extended across transport, energy, telecommunications, and industrial development, contributing to the construction of highways, railways, ports, airports, power plants, industrial parks, and digital infrastructure throughout the continent. These investments sought to address Africa’s long-standing infrastructure deficit, which has consistently been identified as one of the principal constraints on economic growth, industrialisation, and regional integration (African Development Bank, 2024).

Among the most prominent examples were the US$4.5 billion Addis Ababa–Djibouti Railway, which restored a direct transport corridor between Ethiopia and the Port of Djibouti, and Kenya’s Standard Gauge Railway (SGR) connecting Mombasa and Nairobi. These projects significantly improved transport efficiency, reduced travel time and freight costs, and strengthened regional trade by facilitating the movement of goods between production centres, ports, and international markets (African Development Bank, 2024). Similarly, the earlier Tanzania–Zambia Railway (TAZARA), although constructed during the Mao era, continued to demonstrate the long-term economic importance of transport corridors by providing Zambia with an alternative export route for copper while strengthening economic integration within Southern Africa (Monson, 2009).

Beyond transport infrastructure, China’s engagement also contributed to the development of industrial and manufacturing capacity through the establishment of economic cooperation zones and Special Economic Zones (SEZs) in countries such as Ethiopia, Zambia, Egypt, and Nigeria. These zones attracted manufacturing investment, generated employment opportunities, increased export earnings, expanded local production, and contributed to government tax revenues while supporting broader industrial development (Brautigam & Tang, 2011; UNIDO, 2022). In addition, investments in electricity generation, telecommunications networks, and digital infrastructure improved the business environment by expanding access to reliable energy and digital connectivity, both of which are essential for private investment, entrepreneurship, and industrial growth ( Africa Center for Strategic Studies, 2024).

Collectively, these investments have played a significant role in improving Africa’s physical and economic connectivity. Reduced transport costs, shorter delivery times, improved access to electricity, expanded digital networks, and stronger regional integration have enhanced the continent’s capacity to participate in regional and global value chains. However, the economic benefits generated by infrastructure investment have varied across countries, depending upon domestic governance, institutional capacity, complementary industrial policies, and the ability to translate improved infrastructure into sustained economic growth (African Development Bank, 2024). Nevertheless, Chinese investment has made a substantial contribution towards reducing Africa’s infrastructure deficit, making infrastructure development one of the most visible and enduring economic outcomes of China–Africa economic cooperation.

4.1 Trade and Investment

Another major economic outcome of China–Africa economic relations has been the remarkable expansion of bilateral trade and investment. Over the past two decades, commercial exchanges between China and Africa have grown from relatively modest levels into one of the largest economic partnerships in the Global South. Bilateral trade increased from approximately US$10.6 billion in 2000 to nearly US$300 billion by 2024, making China Africa’s largest trading partner since 2009 (Forum on China–Africa Cooperation [FOCAC], 2024; African Development Bank, 2024). This growth has been supported by successive policy initiatives, including the institutional framework created through FOCAC, large-scale infrastructure investments under the Belt and Road Initiative, and more recently, China’s expanded zero-tariff policy for African exports. Together, these developments have strengthened commercial integration and increased the movement of goods, services, capital, and investment between China and African economies (Brautigam, 2009; Boston University Global Development Policy Center, 2024).

The expansion of trade has provided important economic opportunities for many African countries. China’s rapidly growing economy has generated sustained demand for commodities such as crude oil, copper, cobalt, iron ore, manganese, timber, and agricultural products, creating significant export revenues for resource-rich African economies (African Development Bank, 2024). At the same time, Chinese investment has expanded across sectors including mining, manufacturing, construction, telecommunications, renewable energy, finance, and logistics, contributing to the diversification of investment flows into Africa (UNCTAD, 2023; Boston University Global Development Policy Center, 2024). The growth of Chinese foreign direct investment (FDI) has also supported industrial parks, manufacturing facilities, and commercial enterprises that have strengthened productive capacity in several African countries (Brautigam & Tang, 2011; UNIDO, 2022).

Another important development has been China’s efforts to broaden African access to its domestic market. Through the expansion of its zero-tariff policy, China has sought to encourage African exports beyond traditional primary commodities by providing tariff-free access for eligible agricultural products, processed goods, and manufactured products from countries maintaining diplomatic relations with Beijing (Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China, 2025). Although many African exports, particularly crude oil and several mineral products, had already benefited from preferential market access, the policy represents an effort to encourage greater export diversification and increase value-added production within African economies.

Despite this remarkable growth, the structure of China–Africa trade remains uneven. While China primarily exports machinery, electronics, vehicles, telecommunications equipment, and other higher-value manufactured products, many African economies continue to rely heavily on the export of raw materials and primary commodities (Taylor, 2006). As a result, much of the value created through manufacturing and industrial processing continues to occur outside the continent. In recent years, Chinese investment has increasingly focused on securing long-term positions within mining operations, mineral processing, and supply chains for strategic resources such as cobalt, lithium, copper, and uranium. This reflects China’s objective of supporting domestic industries, particularly electric vehicles, batteries, and renewable energy technologies, while maintaining reliable access to critical raw materials (Boston University Global Development Policy Center, 2024; African Development Bank, 2024).

Nevertheless, the economic outcomes of expanding trade and investment have differed considerably across African countries. Resource-rich economies have generally benefited from rising export earnings and increased foreign investment, while countries with more diversified industrial bases have been better positioned to attract manufacturing investment and participate in higher-value production activities. Consequently, the long-term developmental impact of China–Africa trade depends not only on increasing trade volumes but also on the ability of African economies to diversify exports, strengthen domestic industries, and capture a greater share of value-added production ( African Development Bank, 2024).

4.2 Employment and Industrialisation

Beyond infrastructure and trade, another important economic outcome of China–Africa economic cooperation has been its contribution to employment generation and industrial development. As the partnership evolved, Chinese investment increasingly expanded beyond the construction of roads, railways, and ports into manufacturing, industrial production, and value-added industries. This marked an important shift in the relationship, reflecting a growing emphasis on supporting productive economic activities alongside physical infrastructure. Through investments in manufacturing facilities, industrial parks, and Special Economic Zones (SEZs), China sought to encourage industrial development while creating employment opportunities across several African economies (Brautigam & Tang, 2011; United Nations Industrial Development Organization [UNIDO], 2022).

One of the most significant features of this transition was the establishment of Special Economic Zones (SEZs) in countries such as Ethiopia, Nigeria, Zambia, Egypt, and Senegal. Supported by Chinese investment and technical expertise, these zones were designed as integrated industrial ecosystems combining manufacturing facilities, transport infrastructure, reliable electricity, logistics networks, and export-oriented production. Rather than functioning solely as industrial estates, the SEZs aimed to create an environment capable of attracting both domestic and foreign investment while strengthening local manufacturing capacity and increasing export competitiveness (Brautigam & Tang, 2011; UNIDO, 2022). In countries such as Ethiopia, Chinese-supported industrial parks played an important role in expanding the textile and garment manufacturing industry, while Nigeria’s free trade zones encouraged investment across manufacturing, logistics, and processing industries (UNIDO, 2022).

Chinese investment also contributed significantly to employment creation. Across many infrastructure, construction, and manufacturing projects, local employees accounted for a substantial proportion of the workforce, with several studies estimating that between 80 and 90 per cent of employees on many Chinese-funded projects were African nationals (McKinsey & Company, 2017; Brautigam, 2009). As infrastructure development accelerated across the continent, these projects created employment opportunities for thousands of workers in construction, manufacturing, transportation, logistics, engineering support, and industrial services. Beyond direct employment, the expansion of industrial activities also generated indirect jobs through local suppliers, transport operators, maintenance services, and small businesses that emerged around major industrial projects.

Another important aspect of China’s engagement has been the development of human capital through technical cooperation and vocational training. Alongside physical investment, Chinese enterprises increasingly established training centres and implemented programmes aimed at improving technical skills in engineering, manufacturing, telecommunications, digital technology, and logistics. Scholarship programmes, vocational education initiatives, and industry-based training have contributed to developing a more skilled workforce capable of supporting Africa’s expanding industrial sector. More recently, the expansion of digital infrastructure has also created opportunities for training in areas such as 5G network maintenance, digital technologies, information and communication technology (ICT), and logistics management, reflecting the changing technological demands of modern industries (FOCAC, 2021; UNIDO, 2022).

Nevertheless, the broader significance of these developments extends beyond employment alone. Industrialisation enables countries to move beyond dependence on exporting raw commodities by increasing domestic production and value addition. Through manufacturing investment, industrial parks, mineral processing, and export-oriented industries, Chinese engagement has provided opportunities for several African economies to strengthen local productive capacity and participate more actively in regional and global value chains. While progress has differed considerably across countries, these initiatives represent an important step towards expanding industrial activity and reducing reliance on primary commodity exports (African Development Bank, 2024).

Overall, China’s contribution to employment and industrialisation illustrates that the economic relationship has gradually evolved beyond resource extraction and infrastructure development. By supporting manufacturing, developing industrial ecosystems, creating employment opportunities, and investing in technical skills, the partnership has contributed to strengthening Africa’s productive capacity. However, the extent to which these initiatives translate into long-term industrial transformation will ultimately depend on the ability of African economies to sustain industrial growth, encourage technological upgrading, and continue moving towards higher value-added production (UNIDO, 2022).

4.3 Emerging Challenges

Despite the significant economic benefits generated through China–Africa economic cooperation, the partnership continues to face several structural challenges that influence its long-term sustainability. As the relationship has expanded in both scale and complexity, academic and policy discussions have increasingly shifted from questioning the value of Chinese engagement to examining how its economic benefits can be maximised while reducing associated risks (Brautigam, 2009; African Development Bank, 2024).

One of the most frequently discussed challenges concerns the structure of bilateral trade. Although trade volumes have expanded rapidly, exports from many African countries remain heavily concentrated in crude oil, copper, cobalt, iron ore, and other primary commodities, while imports from China largely consist of higher-value manufactured goods, machinery, electronics, and industrial equipment. Consequently, much of the value addition associated with manufacturing and advanced industrial production continues to occur outside Africa, limiting the continent’s ability to capture a greater share of the economic value generated from its own natural resources (Taylor, 2006).

A related challenge is the uneven pace of industrial development across African countries. While Chinese investment has contributed to the establishment of Special Economic Zones, manufacturing facilities, and industrial parks, these benefits have been concentrated in a relatively small number of countries with stronger institutions, larger domestic markets, or more favourable investment environments. Several resource-dependent economies continue to rely primarily on the export of raw materials, highlighting the importance of complementary domestic policies aimed at strengthening local manufacturing, technological capabilities, and value-added production (UNIDO, 2022; African Development Bank, 2024).

Another area of discussion concerns the financial sustainability of large infrastructure investments. During the 2000s and early 2010s, Chinese policy banks financed numerous large-scale infrastructure projects through concessional and resource-backed loans. While these investments addressed critical infrastructure deficits, repayment obligations have raised concerns in some countries experiencing fiscal pressures and slower economic growth. However, recent research indicates that China’s overseas financing strategy has itself evolved, with greater emphasis on commercially viable projects, smaller-scale investments, renewable energy, and public-private partnerships rather than large sovereign lending programmes (Boston University Global Development Policy Center, 2024; Brautigam, 2020). This suggests that the partnership is adapting in response to changing economic conditions rather than remaining static.

The relationship has also faced challenges relating to technology transfer and local capacity building. Although Chinese enterprises have generated employment and expanded vocational training opportunities, the extent to which advanced technologies, managerial expertise, and high-value industrial capabilities are transferred to local firms varies considerably across projects and countries. Maximising the long-term developmental benefits of Chinese investment therefore depends not only on foreign capital but also on domestic policies that encourage innovation, workforce development, research, and industrial upgrading (UNIDO, 2022).

Overall, these challenges do not diminish the significance of China–Africa economic cooperation but rather highlight the evolving nature of the partnership. The future success of China–Africa relations will depend upon balancing infrastructure development, trade expansion, and investment with stronger industrial policies, greater value addition, improved institutional capacity, and sustainable financing mechanisms. Addressing these issues will enable both China and African countries to strengthen a partnership that has evolved from political solidarity into one of the most significant economic relationships in the contemporary Global South (African Development Bank, 2024; Brautigam, 2009).

5. Transformation of China’s Economic Strategy

The findings of this study demonstrate that China’s engagement with Africa did not emerge from a fixed long-term economic blueprint but instead evolved alongside China’s own domestic and international priorities. Following the establishment of the People’s Republic of China in 1949, Beijing faced considerable diplomatic isolation from much of the Western bloc, a situation that became even more pronounced after the Sino–Soviet split during the late 1950s (Alden, 2007; Brautigam, 2009). At approximately the same time, much of Africa was experiencing a wave of decolonisation, with newly independent states seeking political recognition, development partners, and greater autonomy within the international system. Rather than being the result of a predetermined economic strategy, China–Africa relations initially developed because the historical circumstances of both sides converged at a time when cooperation offered mutual political advantages.

Under Mao Zedong, China’s engagement with Africa was primarily driven by the principles of anti-imperialism, Third World solidarity, and diplomatic cooperation. Assistance through medical teams, technical cooperation, agricultural projects, support for liberation movements, and flagship initiatives such as the TAZARA Railway reflected China’s objective of strengthening relationships with newly independent African states while simultaneously expanding its own diplomatic presence beyond the dominant Western and Soviet spheres of influence (Brautigam, 2009; Alden, 2007; Monson, 2009). Economic gain was not the primary objective during this period; instead, political solidarity formed the foundation upon which later economic cooperation would be built.

The transition under Deng Xiaoping represented the first major shift in China’s Africa policy. While maintaining the political goodwill established during the Mao era, Deng recognised that China’s continued development required economic modernisation and greater engagement with the global economy. Consequently, China’s foreign policy became increasingly pragmatic, encouraging commercial cooperation, overseas investment, and the international expansion of Chinese state-owned enterprises alongside continued diplomatic engagement (Vogel, 2011; Brautigam, 2009).

 Africa therefore became not only a political partner but also an increasingly important economic partner capable of contributing to China’s own development objectives.

This transformation accelerated during the administrations of Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao. Policies such as the Going Out Strategy and the establishment of the Forum on China–Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) institutionalised economic cooperation and expanded trade, investment, and infrastructure financing across the continent (Brautigam, 2009; FOCAC, 2000). By the time Xi Jinping assumed office, the relationship had evolved into a comprehensive strategic partnership encompassing the Belt and Road Initiative, the Digital Silk Road, industrial cooperation, critical minerals, renewable energy, and technological collaboration (Naughton, 2021; FOCAC, 2021).

The evolution of China’s strategy therefore illustrates that its engagement with Africa has continuously adapted to changing domestic priorities, international economic conditions, and the developmental aspirations of African countries. Rather than following a single unchanging policy, China’s approach evolved from political solidarity to economic pragmatism, from commercial expansion to strategic integration. This gradual transformation reflects one of the central findings of this study and demonstrates that the China–Africa partnership has remained dynamic rather than static throughout its historical development.

5.1 Transformation of Africa’s Position

The findings of this study indicate that Africa’s position within the China–Africa partnership has undergone a significant transformation over the past seven decades. During the 1950s and 1960s, many African countries had only recently achieved independence and were confronted with the enormous challenge of nation-building. Political sovereignty had been achieved, but economic development remained constrained by weak infrastructure, limited industrial capacity, inadequate healthcare systems, and heavy dependence on the export of primary commodities (Herbst, 2000; Meredith, 2011). At this stage, Africa primarily sought development partners capable of supporting reconstruction, improving infrastructure, and expanding access to finance.

China’s engagement during the Mao era addressed several of these immediate developmental priorities. Projects such as the Tanzania–Zambia Railway (TAZARA) improved regional connectivity by providing landlocked Zambia with an alternative export route for its copper while simultaneously strengthening transport links within Southern Africa (Monson, 2009). Beyond facilitating international trade, transport infrastructure also improved domestic mobility by connecting communities, reducing transport costs, and expanding access to markets and public services. Similarly, the deployment of Chinese Medical Teams (CMTs) and agricultural demonstration projects strengthened healthcare delivery, technical cooperation, and agricultural productivity in several African countries, contributing to broader social and economic development (Brautigam, 2009).

As the partnership evolved, Africa’s role also expanded beyond that of a recipient of development assistance. During the Deng Xiaoping, Jiang Zemin, and Hu Jintao administrations, increasing trade, foreign direct investment, and institutional cooperation through the Forum on China–Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) enabled many African governments to access infrastructure finance, attract manufacturing investment, and participate more actively in international trade (Brautigam, 2009; FOCAC, 2000). Unlike many traditional development programmes that were often accompanied by governance or structural adjustment conditions, Chinese financing generally emphasised economic cooperation and government-to-government partnerships, providing African countries with an additional source of development finance (Alden, 2007; Brautigam, 2009).

The Xi Jinping era further broadened Africa’s position within the partnership. Through initiatives such as the Belt and Road Initiative, the Digital Silk Road, expanding industrial cooperation, and China’s zero-tariff policy for eligible African exports, the continent increasingly became integrated into regional and global production networks (FOCAC, 2021; Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China, 2025). African economies were no longer viewed solely as suppliers of natural resources but also as destinations for manufacturing investment, digital infrastructure, logistics, renewable energy, and industrial cooperation. These developments created new opportunities for employment, skills development, technological learning, and export diversification.

However, the findings also suggest that Africa’s transformation remains incomplete. While the continent has become strategically important within China’s global economic strategy, many African economies continue to depend heavily on the export of raw materials, including crude oil, copper, cobalt, lithium, and other mineral resources, while importing higher-value manufactured products (African Development Bank, 2024). Consequently, much of the value created through manufacturing and advanced processing continues to be generated outside Africa. The evidence therefore indicates that the next stage of Africa’s transformation will depend not only on attracting investment but also on strengthening domestic industrial capacity, expanding local processing industries, encouraging technological upgrading, and increasing participation in higher-value segments of global value chains (UNIDO, 2022).

Overall, the findings demonstrate that Africa has evolved from a newly independent region seeking development assistance into an increasingly important strategic economic partner within the global economy. While China’s engagement has contributed significantly to this transformation through infrastructure, investment, trade, and technology, the long-term developmental trajectory of African economies will ultimately depend on their ability to convert abundant natural resources into higher-value production, stronger industrial capabilities, and sustainable economic growth.

5.2 Transformation of the China–Africa Partnership

The findings of this study demonstrate that the China–Africa relationship has undergone a profound transformation over the past seven decades. What initially emerged during the Mao Zedong era as a partnership founded on political solidarity and South–South cooperation gradually evolved into one characterised by commercial engagement, institutional cooperation, and strategic economic integration. Successive Chinese administrations built upon the foundations established by their predecessors, with initiatives such as the TAZARA Railway, FOCAC, the Going Out Strategy, the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), and the Digital Silk Road collectively shaping a more comprehensive and multidimensional partnership (Brautigam, 2009; Alden, 2007; FOCAC, 2021).

The evidence presented throughout this study suggests that the contemporary China–Africa partnership cannot be adequately understood through simplistic narratives portraying China either as a purely developmental partner or as a neo-colonial actor. China’s engagement has contributed significantly to infrastructure development, trade expansion, employment creation, industrialisation, and technological cooperation across many African countries. At the same time, challenges relating to trade imbalances, value addition, and uneven industrial development continue to shape the long-term outcomes of the relationship (African Development Bank, 2024; Taylor, 2006).

An important finding of this study is that the partnership has evolved alongside the changing priorities of both China and Africa. As China’s domestic economy shifted from political consolidation to economic modernisation and later towards high-quality development, its engagement with Africa similarly evolved from development assistance to investment, trade, digital connectivity, and strategic resource cooperation. Likewise, many African countries have moved from seeking external assistance for basic infrastructure towards pursuing industrial development, manufacturing, technology transfer, and greater participation in regional and global value chains (Naughton, 2021; UNIDO, 2022).

Overall, the findings indicate that the future of China–Africa economic relations will depend not only on continued investment and infrastructure development but also on the ability of African economies to strengthen domestic industrial capacity, expand value-added production, and utilise the opportunities created through this partnership to achieve long-term and sustainable economic development. In this respect, the evolution of China–Africa relations demonstrates not simply the growth of bilateral cooperation, but the transformation of one of the most significant economic partnerships in the contemporary Global South.

Chapter 6: Conclusion

This study examined the historical evolution of China–Africa economic relations from the period of political solidarity under Mao Zedong to the contemporary era of strategic economic partnership under Xi Jinping. By tracing the changing objectives, policies, and economic outcomes across successive Chinese administrations, the study sought to understand how China’s evolving economic strategy shaped its engagement with Africa and how this partnership influenced Africa’s economic development.

The findings demonstrate that China–Africa relations have continuously evolved in response to changing domestic priorities within China and changing developmental needs across Africa. During the Mao Zedong era, the relationship was primarily characterised by political solidarity, anti-imperialist cooperation, and development assistance. Under Deng Xiaoping, economic pragmatism introduced greater emphasis on commercial engagement, while the Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao administrations institutionalised the partnership through initiatives such as the Forum on China–Africa Cooperation (FOCAC), expanding trade, investment, and infrastructure development. More recently, under Xi Jinping, the relationship has further expanded through the Belt and Road Initiative, the Digital Silk Road, industrial cooperation, and collaboration in strategic minerals and emerging technologies (Brautigam, 2009; Alden, 2007).

The study also finds that the economic outcomes of this partnership have been substantial. Chinese investment has contributed to the development of transport infrastructure, ports, railways, industrial parks, digital connectivity, manufacturing, and employment opportunities across many African countries. Bilateral trade has expanded from approximately US$10.6 billion in 2000 to almost US$300 billion in recent years, while China has become Africa’s largest bilateral trading partner ( African Development Bank, 2024). These developments have improved connectivity, supported industrial activity, and increased economic integration between China and African economies.

At the same time, the findings suggest that the partnership cannot be understood through simplistic interpretations that portray China as either a purely benevolent development partner or a purely exploitative economic actor. Although challenges remain—including continued dependence on primary commodity exports, uneven industrial development, and the need for greater domestic value addition—the evidence indicates that African governments have exercised agency in negotiating and shaping their engagement with China according to their own national priorities (Brautigam, 2009; Alden, 2007; Boston University Global Development Policy Center, 2024). Likewise, China’s own policies have continuously adapted in response to changing domestic economic conditions and the evolving international environment.

Taken together, these findings indicate that the evolution of China–Africa relations reflects neither a fixed model of development cooperation nor a one-sided economic arrangement. Rather, the partnership has continuously adapted to changing domestic priorities, global economic conditions, and the evolving development strategies of African states. While China has secured reliable access to strategic resources and expanded its global economic influence, African countries have benefited from infrastructure development, increased investment, technology, employment opportunities, and greater integration into international markets. Nevertheless, these benefits have not been distributed equally. Resource-rich economies have generally experienced greater gains, while many African countries continue to face structural challenges arising from dependence on primary commodity exports, limited industrial capacity, and persistent trade imbalances.

Ultimately, the long-term success of the China–Africa partnership will depend not only on continued Chinese investment but also on Africa’s ability to transform its abundant natural resources into higher-value products through industrialisation, technological upgrading, and domestic value addition. Rather than remaining primarily exporters of raw materials, African countries should strengthen manufacturing capacity, develop mineral processing and refining industries, expand regional value chains, invest in technical education and innovation, and pursue development strategies aligned with their individual comparative advantages. Resource-rich states should prioritise downstream processing industries, manufacturing economies should deepen industrial production and attract higher-value investment, while strategically located port economies should strengthen logistics and regional trade networks. By moving beyond resource extraction towards value creation, African economies will be better positioned to capture a greater share of the wealth generated from their own resources, creating a more balanced, resilient, and mutually beneficial partnership with China in the decades ahead.

Recommendations

The future success of China–Africa economic relations will depend not only on continued Chinese investment but also on African countries’ ability to pursue development strategies that reflect their distinct economic strengths and resource endowments (Miao et al., 2020). Given the diversity of the continent, a uniform approach is unlikely to achieve sustainable and inclusive growth (Mavhunga, 2023). Resource-rich countries such as the Democratic Republic of Congo, Zambia, Namibia, and Angola should prioritise domestic value addition by investing in mineral processing, refining, and downstream manufacturing industries rather than relying predominantly on the export of raw materials (Cervantes Barron et al., 2024; Müller, 2023). Morris and Fessehaie (2014) argue that developing backward and forward linkages to the commodity sectors is central to Africa’s industrialisation, and that each resource-based strategy comes with its own set of complications. Mavhunga (2023) further notes that African countries have realised that continuing to export materials raw is an unsustainable path of dependency, and that emphasis is now on value addition across the mineral chain, particularly for chrome, cobalt, and lithium.

Countries with established manufacturing bases, including Ethiopia, Egypt, Nigeria, South Africa, and Morocco, should expand industrial parks, strengthen local supply chains, and attract greater manufacturing investment as Chinese industries increasingly relocate higher-value production abroad (Alves & Alden, 2024). Bräutigam et al. (2018) demonstrate that Chinese manufacturing investment in Africa is expanding rapidly, with firms ranging from large network-seeking producers to smaller clustered enterprises that create different kinds of development opportunities for structural transformation. Alves and Alden (2024) show that while static industrialisation policies such as special economic zones can be transplanted, the dynamic aspects that underpin China’s model face challenges due to differences in institutional capacity and contextual synergies. Similarly, strategically located port economies such as Kenya, Tanzania, and Djibouti should leverage their geographic advantages by developing integrated logistics hubs, free trade zones, and regional distribution networks that facilitate intra-African and international trade (Styan, 2019). The Djibouti International Free Trade Zone, a flagship China–Africa cooperation project launched in 2018, exemplifies how port-park-city development models can transform small strategically located nations into regional trade hubs linking Africa to global markets (Djibouti Ports and Free Zones Authority, 2025).

Beyond country-specific strategies, broader continental reforms are equally important. African governments should strengthen domestic industrial capacity, promote export diversification, encourage technology transfer through investment agreements, and invest in technical education and workforce development to enhance long-term competitiveness (Ehizuelen, 2018; World Bank, 2020). Greater coordination through regional initiatives such as the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) can also improve bargaining power and support the development of regional value chains (de Mélo & Twum, 2021; African Union Commission & OECD, 2022). The AfCFTA is expected to generate substantial economic benefits, including higher income arising from increased efficiency and productivity, higher cross-border investment flows, and technology transfers, though these benefits will require reducing tariff and non-tariff barriers (Ábrego et al., 2020). Ultimately, the success of China–Africa economic relations should not be measured solely by increasing trade volumes or infrastructure investment, but by the extent to which African economies move up regional and global value chains (Ericsson et al., 2020). Sustainable development will depend on expanding value-added production, strengthening industrial capabilities, and adopting development strategies tailored to each country’s comparative advantages, thereby fostering a more balanced and mutually beneficial partnership between China and Africa (Kaplinsky & Morris, 2009).

REFERENCES 

Xu, J., Brautigam, D., & Taylor, I. (2011). [Review of The Dragon’s Gift: The Real Story of China in Africa; China’s New Role in Africa]. St Antony’s International Review, 6(2), 188–190. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26226773

Alden, C. (2010). China in Africa. In Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa (Vols. 12–12, Issue 8) [Journal-article]. Clarion University of Pennsylvania, Clarion, Pennsylvania. https://jsd-africa.com/Jsda/Vol12No8_Winter2010_B/PDF/BR_China%20in%20Africa.pdf

Taylor, I. (2006). China and Africa: Engagement and Compromise (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203968635

Deng Xiaoping and the transformation of China — Harvard University Press. (n.d.). Harvard University Press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674725867

Monson, J. (2009). Africa’s Freedom Railway: How a Chinese development project changed lives and livelihoods in Tanzania. Indiana University Press. https://www.sahistory.org.za/sites/default/files/archive-files/jamie_monson_africas_freedom_railway_how_a_chibookos.org_.pdf

Herbst, J. (2000). States and Power in Africa: Comparative Lessons in Authority and Control – Second Edition (REV-Revised, 2, Second Edition). Princeton University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt9qh05m

Meredith, M. (2005). The State of Africa. The Free Press. https://www.intuganda.org/wp-content/uploads/kanzu_intug/class24/The-State-of-Africa-A-History-of-the-Continent-Since-Independence-Martin-Meredith.pdf

The fate of Africa : from the hopes of freedom to the heart of despair : a history of fifty years of independence : Meredith, Martin : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive. (2005). Internet Archive. https://archive.org/details/fateofafricafrom00mere

Brautigam, D. B., School of International Service, American University, Tang, X., & New School for Social Research. (2011). African Shenzhen: China’s special economic zones in Africa. In J. Of Modern African Studies (Vol. 49, Issue 1, pp. 27–54). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022278X10000649

Naughton, B. (2021). THE RISE OF CHINA ́S INDUSTRIAL POLICY, 1978-2020. In Silvia Jiménez Barba (Ed.), THE RISE OF CHINA´S INDUSTRIAL POLICY, 1978-2020. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Economía. https://dusselpeters.com/CECHIMEX/Naughton2021_Industrial_Policy_in_China_CECHIMEX.pdf

World Bank Group: Africa Economic Update. (n.d.). World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/region/afr/publication/africa-economic-update

World Bank. 2026. Special Economic Zones in South Africa 2026: Policy Review. © World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/45159 

China-Africa Economic Bulletin, 2024 Edition | Global Development Policy Center. (n.d.). © 2026 Boston University. https://www.bu.edu/gdp/2024/04/01/china-africa-economic-bulletin-2024-edition/

Chinese loans to Africa database. (n.d.). https://www.bu.edu/gdp/chinese-loans-to-africa-database/

WTO | China – Member information. (n.d.). https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/countries_e/china_e.htm

Ábrego, L., de Zamaróczy, M., Gursoy, T., Nicholls, G., Perez-Saiz, H., & Rosas, J.-N. (2020). The African continental free trade area. *IMF Staff Discussion Note*, SDN/2020/006. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513542379.006

African Union Commission & OECD. (2022). Strengthening regional value chains in the African Continental Free Trade Area. In *Africa’s development dynamics*. https://doi.org/10.1787/d5077890-en

Alves, A. C., & Alden, C. (2024). China’s economic and trade cooperation zones in Africa: From static model emulation to dynamic learning. *Area Development and Policy*, 9(1), 28–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/23792949.2023.2300988

Bräutigam, D., Tang, X., & Xia, Y. (2018). What kinds of Chinese ‘geese’ are flying to Africa? Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms. *Journal of African Economies*, 27(suppl_1), i29–i51. https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/ejy013

Cervantes Barron, K., Clube, R. K. M., Chabala, R. M., Matokwani, M., & Chikwamo, M. J. (2024). Value addition for who? Challenges to local participation in downstream critical mineral ventures in Zambia. *The Extractive Industries and Society*, 19, 101554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2024.101554

de Mélo, J., & Twum, A. (2021). Prospects and challenges for supply chain trade under the Africa Continental Free Trade Area. *Journal of African Trade*, 8(1–2), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.2991/jat.k.210105.001

Djibouti Ports and Free Zones Authority. (2025). *About DIFTZ: Djibouti International Free Trade Zone*. https://www.diftz.dj/index.php?a=index&c=Lists&lang=en&m=home&tid=42

Ehizuelen, M. M. O. (2018). Education and skills development in China-Africa cooperation. *Frontiers of Education in China*, 13(4), 479–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-018-0030-0

Ericsson, M., Löf, O., & Löf, A. (2020). Chinese control over African and global mining—Past, present and future. *Mineral Economics*, 33, 153–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-020-00233-4

Kaplinsky, R., & Morris, M. (2009). Chinese FDI in Sub-Saharan Africa: Engaging with large dragons. *European Journal of Development Research*, 21(4), 551–569. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2009.24

Mavhunga, C. C. (2023). Africa’s move from raw material exports toward mineral value addition: Historical background and implications. *MRS Bulletin*, 48, 363–369. https://doi.org/10.1557/s43577-023-00534-3

Miao, M., Lang, Q., Borojo, D. G., Yushi, J., & Zhang, X. (2020). The impacts of Chinese FDI and China–Africa trade on economic growth of African countries: The role of institutional quality. *Economies*, 8(3), 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies8030053

Morris, M., & Fessehaie, J. (2014). The industrialisation challenge for Africa: Towards a commodities based industrialisation path. *Journal of African Trade*, 1(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joat.2014.10.001

Müller, M. (2023). The ‘new geopolitics’ of mineral supply chains: A window of opportunity for African countries. *South African Journal of International Affairs*, 30(2), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2023.2226108

Styan, J.-C. B. (2019). Djibouti and China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Implications for the Horn of Africa. In *Belt and Road Initiative and Djibouti*. Birkbeck, University of London. https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/28399/

World Bank. (2020). *The future of work in Africa: Harnessing the potential of digital technologies for all*. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1444-0