IISPPR

Category: Uncategorized

Advancing Urban Institutional Transparency through Digital Governance: A Comparative Analysis of Anti-Corruption and Public Trust Mechanisms in India and Europe

Asanda Keitumetse Khwabe, Maksym Loharzhevskyi, Omundu Eddy Odhiambo and Onemena Odebala Accountability, rule of law and trust are at a continuous turbulent state that serve as the foundation of peace, justice and strong institutions categorised as the SDG 16. The inconsistency of such factors contributes to the global polycrisis of instability, birthing corruption and mismanagement. Thus, with such an environment conjured, institutions cannot mandate sustainable cities and communities of SDG 11, which ultimately break down the vital state-citizen relationship. Continuously, quantitative data research has revealed that the introduction of integrating information and communications technology (ICT) into the political realm will promote transparency, reinforce better trust mechanisms, and contribute to anti-corruption attempts. This particular paper explored two different regions, India and European countries, executing the transformation of e-governance while revealing the extent of successes of maintaining both SDG 16 and SDG 11 goals as well as the challenges faced by both regions. It is imperative to understand that strong institutions and the performance style in which to manage their unique society have not been perfected, for there are always different multifaceted factors such as circumstances presented by histories of the regions as well as the dynamics instilled and practiced by the government and people based on preferences to use. Thus, with expectations, functioning governing bodies should be able to sustain their societies, ensure transparent justice and safety, and curate mandates for the betterment of the civil. Thus, this paper concludes such findings of the specific method of integrating ICTs in attempts to bridge the existing disconnect experienced by multiple institutions.

Read More »

From Paper to Practice: A Study on Health-System Bias and Exclusions in Assessing SRHR in India

Aashi Sahu, Anshim, Ritika Jindal, Swastika Kar Abstract This paper attempts to investigate the gap between reproductive health policies in India and theirgrassroots implementation. Special focus is given to marginalized women, mainly those from Dalitand tribal backgrounds. Although there are various legal frameworks such as the Janani SurakshaYojana (JSY) and the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act amendments, deep rootedimpediments continue to restrict women’s access to sexual and reproductive health rights (SRHR).Most mainstream literature focuses on service outreach metrics but fails to look into theintersectional realities of caste, class, age, and geography in health-system interactions.Methodologically, this paper builds on the qualitative approach with content analysis of policydocuments, review of secondary data, and semi-structured interviews with women. Alongside, thispaper explores the lacuna in SRHR. Primary focus is given to institutional bias, provider’s attitudes,and lack of infrastructure that result in denial or delay of services. Emphasizing lived experiencesand examining the state’s accountability in ensuring bodily autonomy, the research aims to offer anuanced critique of India’s reproductive health landscape. The paper concludes with policyrecommendations targeting both structural reforms and sensitization frameworks to makereproductive rights meaningfully accessible to marginalized women.

Read More »

From Non-Alignment to Trade Alliances – India’s Evolving Role in Global Trade Forums

Author: Rajan Patel India’s strategic positioning India’s engagement with BRICS and the G20 reflects its consistent efforts to shape the global political discourse in line with its own interests, while also promoting ideas like multilateralism, inclusive development, and reforming existing institutions. India is often seen as a democratic counterweight to China’s influence in the region and even though both countries align on certain economic and developmental issues, their bilateral ties remain tense mainly because of long-standing territorial disputes and trade imbalances but these tensions have at times helped India maintain its ties with the West, where it is increasingly viewed as a credible alternative to China in the region (Stimson, 2022). India’s trade with BRICS countries witnessed a substantial growth over a period of 4 years as it increased from USD 120.65 billion in 2019 to around USD 174.45 billion in 2023, with China alone accounting for over USD 122 billion (Kamalakar, 2024), a significant percent of India’s trade. Addressing this issue, India has tried to strengthen its ties with Russia, especially post-Ukraine war, and expanded trade with Brazil and South Africa in areas like defence, energy, and pharmaceuticals. It has also supported the expansion of BRICS to include countries such as Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Ethiopia, and the UAE, positioning itself as a leader of the Global South while also pushing for strategic autonomy through ideas like de-dollarisation and the proposal of a BRICS currency (Pant & Jayaprakash, 2024). India’s G20 presidency in 2023 marked a diplomatic shift by putting the Global South at the centre of the conversation. The theme “Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam – One Earth, One Family, One Future” was more than just a symbol; it showed India’s effort to reposition itself as a consensus-builder in a world that is divided (Kumar, 2024) The Voice of the Global South Summit brought together 125 countries, and India’s leadership was evident in its success as it promoted the inclusion of the African Union as a permanent member of the G20 – a move that addressed long-standing concerns around institutional equity and representation (India Foundation, 2023; Kumar, 2024). Economic Policy and Initiatives India has always been committed to global financial reforms, as it supported the Common Framework for Debt Treatment, calling for an overhaul of international financial institutions, so they could better serve the interests of emerging economies while also advocating for a comprehensive restructuring of debts, as developing countries held nearly 30% of the world’s USD 92 trillion debt (Kumar, 2024), a much-needed intervention helping countries like Zambia, Ghana, and Ethiopia. India also pushed for greater South-South trade cooperation, which rose from USD 140.75 billion in 1990 to USD 9.36 trillion in 2021 and measures like the Jaipur Call to Action and the Digital Trade Documentation Principles reflected this priority. India also pushed for greater South-South trade cooperation, which rose from USD 140.75 billion in 1990 to USD 9.36 trillion in 2021. Measures like the Jaipur Call to Action and the Digital Trade Documentation Principles reflected this priority. Digital Push and Global Role India also aced the race for digitization and its digital public infrastructure – the Aadhaar, UPI, Co-Win – was showcased as a model for the Global South, backed by the launch of a Global DPI Repository and a USD 25 million contribution to the DPI Impact Fund which played a key role in announcing the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC), offering an alternative to China’s connectivity push (Kumar, 2024; India Foundation, 2023). Together, India’s role in BRICS and the G20 is a reflection of its attempt to maintain strategic autonomy while still leading on issues that matter to the developing world. It is not just participating—it is shaping.

Read More »
Uncategorized
Anto Mariya M M

Political Implications of India’s Foreign Policy Shifts

Political Implications of India’s Foreign Policy Shifts Author: Anto Mariya M M Introduction                India and its foreign policy have been a puzzle for many, with significant shifts over the years. These shifts in India’s relations with the nations of the world have undoubtedly had an impact on its global positioning. In addition, the implications of Indian foreign policy shifts have been multifaceted. The article primarily focuses on its impact on its neighbourhood as well as domestically in terms of the role of its federal states. The growing role of paradiplomacy in international engagement by Indian states is also captured. Changes have been witnessed in its stance on nuclear policy and its eloquent role in global institutions. India was able to become a Nuclear weapons state despite international sanctions. India has become more vocal on multilateral platforms due to its evident growth in hard and soft power. Impact on India’s Neighbourhood and Beyond Keeping strategic autonomy as the top placeholder in Indian foreign policy, India has left NAM in the past. India was once a leader of non-aligned countries, but its present moves strive towards multi-alignment. The Modi Government’s ‘Neighbourhood First Policy’ made the immediate neighbours the main priority. However, in reaction to China’s rise in the region, India turned its diplomatic priorities to Southeast Asia by transforming its ‘Look East Policy’ to a proactive ‘Act East Policy’. It has been challenging for India to restrict Chinese influence in South Asian countries’ investments and infrastructure. Through development assistance programs and connectivity projects in Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Afghanistan, India has attempted to counterbalance China’s assertiveness by putting forward its own projects, such as the IMEC, in opposition to the Chinese Belt & Road Initiative. With BRI, the String of Pearls and all that, the Indian foreign policy shifts have led to an increased focus on maritime security. India uses groupings like the Quad to grow its influence in the Indo-Pacific. Regarding the relations with Pakistan, India has taken a proactive approach, even launching surgical strikes in response to terrorist attacks like the Uri attack, stressing that cross-border terrorism is a no-go. Ignoring SAARC and moving on with BIMSTEC, an organisation excluding Pakistan for regional engagement. India’s stance on its neighbourhood has changed with shifts in its foreign policy approaches. Effect on Indian Federalism The shifts in Indian foreign policy have led to more vocal Indian states on the foreign policy agenda. Earlier, the subject of foreign policy was solely an issue of the central government. However, times have changed. The consequences of foreign policy decisions and actions have repercussions on the states as well. India’s stance on the fishermen’s issues and the state of relations with Sri Lanka have a direct impact on Tamil Nadu (Thakkar, 2021). The agreements and disagreements over the Teesta River water sharing affect the people of West Bengal. A large diaspora in Gulf nations is from the state of Kerala, and cordial relations with them are crucial. Kerala, thus, has an interest in ties with the Gulf nations. The Northeastern states sharing borders with sovereign states are no exception. The political developments in Myanmar, like the military coup, strain the Northeastern state of Manipur. The states in Northeast India are faced with refugee crises whenever there is political turmoil and instability in their neighbouring, bordering countries. These federal states, thus, become invested in India’s relations with those nations that share borders with them, as well as India’s response to such foreign policy issues. Paradiplomacy refers to the international activities carried out by subnational entities which are not sovereign states. In traditional diplomacy, sovereign states engage in diplomatic relations with each other, but paradiplomacy involves subnational entities asserting themselves on the international stage (Bharat, 2023).  Paradiplomacy gives states space where their local sentiments can be addressed, thus leading to decentralisation in foreign policy decisions. In the case of Gujarat, the state has been projecting itself as the ideal investment destination in India. It is undeniable that Gujarat, through its subnational engagements, has increasingly attracted not just economic investments but is also now paving the way for cooperation on sustainable development (South Asia@LSE, 2017). The growing role of para-diplomacy is evident in issues affecting the states’ economic as well as security interests. It is challenging the traditional centralisation of foreign policy decision-making. Indian federalism is changing in the sense that the states are no longer passive recipients. Thus, the shifts in Indian foreign policy are a reason for the changing dynamics of federal-state relations in India. Indian Voice in Global Institutions India’s more vocal participation in multilateral forums shines a light on its rise on the ladder among global powers. India is the largest democracy in the world, home to 1.4 billion people, has the fifth largest economy, and is moving forward in technological aspects. India has larger aspirations to become a dominant power, shaping the course of global politics. In line with its hard power and soft power growth, the advocacy for equitable representation and reforming the existing global governance structure resonates with them. India has traditionally supported UNSC revisions to reflect geopolitical realities (India’s Role, 2024). In addition to permanent member status for itself in the Security Council, it proposes adding African and Asian states to permanent and non-permanent membership. The United Nations, as instituted in 1945 after the Second World War, do not represent the current power dynamics, which is why nations like India are striving for a reformation in the UN. Permanent membership could give India veto power over any decisions in the forum. This eloquent stand for permanent membership shows its growth in strategic power, a consequence of its shifting foreign policy. Even in the fight against climate change, India stands with developing countries, asking the wealthier nations to finance more for the cause on global platforms like the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the International Solar Alliance. India has been encouraging South-South cooperation in climate finance as well as global governance reforms. In addition to

Read More »