Skip to main content

IISPPR

Category: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions
Biswarupa Mishra

EFFECTIVENESS OF FAST-TRACK COURTS IN REDUCING CASE PENDENCY IN INDIA

This study evaluates the effectiveness of India’s Fast Track Courts (FTCs) and Fast Track Special Courts (FTSCs) in reducing case pendency and delivering substantive justice. Analyzing secondary data from the Department of Justice, NCRB, and NJDG, it reveals faster disposals alongside uneven progress driven by institutional capacities and vacancies. Sustainable impact requires dedicated infrastructure, stable funding, and fairness.

Read More »
Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions
Hansika Patnaik

Regulating the Digital Afterlife: A Critical Analysis of Digital Remains, Post-Mortem Privacy and Commercial Exploitation under Indian Law

Indian law provides protection through different legal mechanisms relating to privacy, data protection, succession, intellectual property, personality rights and commercial exploitation. However, these protections remain fragmented and do not provide a comprehensive framework specifically governing the digital afterlife.

Read More »
Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions
Kavya Mishra

Regulating the Digital Afterlife: A Comparative Study of Digital Remains, Post-Mortem Privacy, and Personality Rights.

This paper examines the legal and ethical challenges surrounding digital remains, post-mortem privacy, and personality rights in India. Through comparative analysis, it highlights gaps in existing laws and advocates comprehensive legislation protecting dignity, autonomy, and informational privacy after death.

Read More »
Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions
Yashita Dhaundiyal, Kakul Sharma

A Systematic Review of Autonomous Weapon Systems under International Humanitarian Law

Authors: Yashita Dhaundiyal and Kakul Sharma Abstract The battlefield has always been a place of destruction where behind every act of war, there was always a human being who could judge, take responsibility, and was bound by law. But now, that assurance is fading. Artificial intelligence is developing rapidly in modern military systems. Systems like drones are no longer waiting for commands; they identify targets, select them, and engage them by themselves. We can no longer say that a human is behind every act of violence. As these systems move from movies into real life, the world has to ask: can a machine fight a war legally? Can a machine also be bound by law? This paper’s focus is to examine the legality of autonomous weapon systems under international law, focusing on the challenges they are going to bring to accountability, humanitarian rules, and global regulations. This is not just a theory; it is a real, practical problem. The United States, China, Russia, and Israel have already developed these systems, and AI-assisted targeting systems are already part of the defense strategies of major military powers, making real decisions with little to no human oversight. What is still missing is any real international accountability. As legal scholars have called it, this is a responsibility gap; a fundamental crack in the moral architecture of war itself. When a target is selected, when a life is taken, someone has to answer for it. Autonomous weapons challenge that premise at its very core, and the international legal order has not caught up. The main argument of this paper is that autonomous weapons as they exist today create serious conflicts with the foundational rules of international humanitarian law; and this responsibility gap must be addressed urgently, because war has always needed accountability, and that does not go away just because the combatant no longer has a face. Keywords: Autonomous Weapons Systems, International Humanitarian Law, Responsibility Gap, Accountability, Artificial Intelligence in Warfare

Read More »
Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions
Ryka Gogoi

Under SDG 16 Integrating JS Mill’s Framework – for Enhancing Institutional Accountability and Inclusive Decision-Making

This paper argues that accountability should be understood as public answerability, justification, and responsiveness. Drawing on Mill’s writings, it proposes a normative framework for evaluating SDG 16 institutions in terms of democratic quality, legitimacy, and meaningful civic participation.

Read More »
Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions
ESTHAR MARIYA DOMINIC

Oil, U.S. Intervention, and the Crisis of the Rules-Based International Order: The Case Study of Venezuela

This article examines the legality and geopolitical implications of U.S. intervention in Venezuela within the rules-based international order (RBIO). It argues that selective enforcement of international norms undermines sovereignty, weakens the legitimacy of international law, and accelerates the erosion of the RBIO in an emerging multipolar world.

Read More »
Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions
Sneha Kumari Shaw

Global Supply Chain Disruption due to turmoil in the Middle East

Approximately 12% of total global trade passes through the Suez

Canal.Roughly 30% of the world’s seaborne oil trade passes through the Strait

of Hormuz.It is a crucial waterway connecting the Red Sea and the

Mediterranean Sea, offering a shorter shipping route between Asia and

Europe.Due to the recent conflict between Israel and Hamas, this region has

created uncertainty in the global supply chain.This region is a major supplier

of oil and petroleum products; any disruption here can impact all sectors in all

countries.Therefore, keeping in mind the importance of this region, this report

specifically focuses on the disruptions created by the Israel-Israel conflict

and their impact.

Read More »
Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions
priyanshi jha

Custodial Violence: A deep rooted issue

This research article entitled “Custodial Violence: A Deep-Rooted Issue” examines the widespread phenomenon of custodial violence, defined as physical, psychological, and sexual abuse by police and prison authorities. The paper reviews legal provisions related to custodial violence, identifies structural factors that fuel its prevalence, and reviews paradigmatic case studies that document judicial reactions. The report highlights the imperative necessity of holistic reforms, such as increased training for police, independent oversight, and open accountability mechanisms. Finally, it promotes a tripartite strategy between government, judiciary, and civil society to eliminate custodial violence and restore public confidence in the justice system.

Read More »