Author(s): Pandilatha S, Vinita Pathak , Naman Bishambhu , Parvathy M A
Abstract
Environmental pollution has become a critical and widely concerned global economic issue, imposing significant health-related costs that slows down economic development. Pollution-induced diseases lead to rising healthcare expenses, productivity losses, and reduced labor efficiency, particularly in rapidly industrializing economies. This paper examines the economic impact of pollution-related health costs from 2014 to 2024, analyzing global and regional trends. Using data from the World Bank, WHO, and OECD, it presents quantitative insights into the economic burden of pollution and explores policy interventions aimed at mitigating these effects.
1. Introduction
Pollution is the largest environmental cause of disease and premature death. Pollution causes more than 9 million premature deaths, the majority of them due to air pollution(World Bank , 2024).
Industrialization, use of pesticides and nitrogen-based fertilizers, crop residues in agriculture, urbanization, forest fires, desert dust, and inadequate waste management have intensified environmental health risks and pollution, especially in low- and middle-income countries. At the same time, the global economy relies on deeply intertwined supply chains, sustained by more than 100 billion tons of raw materials entering the system each year. Intensive material consumption depletes natural resources and causes negative environmental impacts at every stage of the product lifecycle including production, use phase, and end-of-life. Global waste is expected to increase to 3.4 billion tons by 2050.
The economic consequences of environmental pollution extend far beyond ecological damage. The World Bank (2023) estimates that pollution-related health costs exceed $8.9 trillion annually, accounting for approximately 6.3% of global GDP. Air pollution alone causes 7 million premature deaths per year (WHO, 2023), with associated healthcare expenses and productivity losses significantly slowing economic development. Countries with high pollution levels, such as China, India, and Bangladesh, face reductions in GDP upto 3-4% annually due to pollution-related health issues. This study examines the long-term economic slowdown driven by pollution-induced health costs and assesses policy measures that can mitigate these effects.
2. Review of Literature
2.1. Health Costs of Environmental Pollution
The Lancet Commission on Pollution and Health (2018) reported that pollution-related diseases caused 9 million deaths globally in the year 2015, resulting in loss of productivity upto $4.6 trillion.Global health crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, are reminders of the strong linkages between environment and health and of the need to address such linkages systematically.
Recent evidence, Lancet Planetary Health (2023) points to severe devastation caused by exposure to harmful chemicals, such as lead. In 2019, more than 5.5 million adults died from cardiovascular disease arising from lead exposure. 90% of these deaths occurred in lower- and middle-income countries. In the same year, children younger than 5 years of age lost 765 million IQ points.
OECD (2023) estimates that by the year 2060, air pollution could reduce global GDP by 1.2% annually due to increased healthcare expenditures and reduced workforce efficiency.
A WHO (2023) study found that exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) has significantly increased cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, with low-income populations disproportionately affected.
A recent World Bank (2022) publication found that air pollution cost the globe an estimated $8.1 trillion in 2019, equivalent to 6.1 percent of global GDP. More than 95 percent of deaths caused by air pollution occur in low- and middle- income countries.
2.2. Economic Impacts of Pollution-Induced Health Issues
Lancet (2023) Lead exposure cost countries $6 trillion, equivalent to 6.9% of global GDP.
World Bank (2024) reports that pollution-related productivity losses cost India $107 billion annually, approximately 3.5% of GDP.
European Environment Agency (2023) found that air pollution costs the EU economy €350–950 billion per year in healthcare expenses and lost workdays.
A Harvard University (2022) study estimates that air pollution from fossil fuels leads to $900 billion in annual economic losses in the United States.
3. Research Methodology
3.1. Data Collection
This study compiles data from 2014 to 2024 using reports from:
World Bank, WHO, OECD, European Environment Agency
Pollution and economic loss databases
Air pollution as the major health risk and contributor of health expenditures:
In 2024, air pollution caused 8.1 million premature deaths globally, costing the world an estimated $8.1 trillion annually, with the burden disproportionately affecting low- and middle-income countries,making it the second leading global risk factor for death.
The economic cost of air pollution-related health damage is estimated at $8.1 trillion annually, equivalent to 6.1% of global GDP.
Low- and middle-income countries bear the highest burden of air pollution, with 89% of the 4.2 million premature deaths occurring in these areas. More than 700,000 deaths in children under 5 years were linked to air pollution in 2021.Nearly 90% of the disease burden from air pollution is attributed to noncommunicable diseases like heart disease, stroke, diabetes, lung cancer, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Countries in Asia, Africa, and the Middle East continue to experience the highest levels of ambient PM2.5.Specifically among the South Asian Countries , Bangladesh, Pakistan, and India rank the highest AQI levels globally.IQAir’s World Air Quality Report ranked Chad as the most polluted country in 2024.
The so-called Indian capital, Delhi remained the most polluted capital in the world, with an annual average PM2.5 concentration of more than 90µg/m3. As per WHO Air Quality Standards,only seven countries in the world had air quality levels at or below the healthy annual average recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2024.
Thus the Countries adhering to WHO Standards are Australia, Estonia, New Zealand, Iceland, Grenada, Puerto Rico, and French Polynesia as they continue to met the WHO annual PM2.5 guideline level.
A study(Lancet Planet Health) indicates air pollution causes 5% to 12% Crop yield losses globally which is an indirect economic loss due to the non availability of expected level of produce in the market.Thus air pollution by driving rapid Climate Change and unpredictable weather fluctuations is directly responsible for loss of productivity and diminished crop yields.
The economic losses due to increased healthcare costs are significant, and the total burden of diseases is approximately 4.2 % of GDP, rising to 9.9% of GDP by the end of the projection period.
Lead, resulting from pollution as a major public health concern and contributor In health expenditures:
Lead is the single chemical with by far the largest quantified health effects globally,which could be influenced by research so far and data availability.
We have taken the reference of the Lancet Planet Health 2023 study in correspondence to The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA, to analyze the health costs of environmental pollution by lead.which uses ,blood lead level estimates from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2019. The study examines the IQ loss (presented as estimated loss in IQ points with 95% CIs) in the global population of children younger than 5 years using the blood lead level–IQ loss function from an international pooled analysis, along with the cost of IQ loss, which was calculated only for the proportion of children expected to enter the labour force, as the present value of loss in lifetime income from the IQ loss (presented as cost in US dollars and percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) with a range). It also examines cardiovascular deaths (with 95% CIs) due to lead exposure among people aged 25 years or older using a health impact model that captures the effect of lead exposure on cardiovascular disease mortality that is mediated through mechanisms other than hypertension. Finally, the study utilizes the values of statistical life to estimate the welfare cost of premature mortality (presented as cost in US dollars and percentage of GDP). All estimates were calculated by World Bank income classification and region (for low-income and middle-income countries [LMICs] only) for 2019.
Key indicators analyzed:
Annual economic losses due to pollution-related health impacts in (% of GDP)
Healthcare expenditures related to pollution-induced diseases
Workforce productivity decline due to pollution-related health conditions
3.2. Analytical Approach
A comparative analysis of pollution-related economic losses in terms of % loss in GDP across different income-level countries is conducted.Through this a direct correlation between pollution levels and economic slowdown is established.
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Trends in Pollution-Related Economic Losses (2014-2024)
Over the past decade, pollution-related economic losses have increased substantially:
Global losses rose from $5.4 trillion in 2014 to over $8.9 trillion in 2024, reflecting worsening air quality and rising healthcare costs.
Lead is one of WHO’s ten chemicals of major public health concern, and lead exposure is ranked fourth among major environmental health risk factors after ambient particulate matter air pollution, household air pollution from solid fuels, and unsafe household drinking water, sanitation, and handwashing according to the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2019.
Table 1.Countries classified based on Income status,World Bank regions and their respective population-weighted means blood lead levels (2019)
Image credits:Lancet Planet Health 2023,World Bank
Children younger than 5 years lost 765 million (95% CI 443–1098) IQ points and that 5 545 000 (2 305 000–8 271 000) adults died from cardiovascular disease in 2019 due to lead exposure.
Figure 1. presents IQ loss from blood lead level during the first 5 years of life from the study by Crump and colleagues
Image credits:Lancet Planet Health 2023,World Bank
Figure 2.presents the RR (Relative Risk) of cardiovascular disease mortality that we applied to estimate global cardiovascular disease deaths from lead exposure.
Image credits:Lancet Planet Health 2023,World Bank
Table 2.
Image credits:Lancet Planet Health 2023,World Bank
Table 3.
Image credits:Lancet Planet Health 2023,World Bank
729 million of the IQ points lost (95·3% of the total global IQ loss) and 5 004 000 (90·2% of total) cardiovascular disease deaths due to lead exposure occurred in (Lower and Middle Income Countries)LMICs. IQ loss in LMICs was nearly 80% higher than a previous estimate. Cardiovascular disease deaths were six times higher than the GBD 2019 estimate.
The global cost of lead exposure was US$6·0 trillion (range 2·6–9·0) in 2019, which was equivalent to 6·9% (3·1–10·4) of the global gross domestic product.
77% (range 70–78) of the cost was the welfare cost of cardiovascular disease mortality, and 23% (22–30) was the present value of future income losses from IQ loss.
Figure 3.Developing countries experience higher GDP losses due to pollution
Figure 4. Global Economic Losses Due to Pollution (2014-2024)
India: 3.5% GDP loss
Bangladesh: 4.1% GDP loss
Nigeria: 3.3% GDP loss
U.S.: 1.8% GDP loss
Germany: 1.3% GDP loss
4.2. Sectoral Economic Impacts
4.2.1. Workforce Productivity Decline
Air pollution contributes to 2.1 billion lost workdays annually (World Bank, 2023).
China’s industrial sector lost $45 billion in labor productivity in 2023 due to pollution-related illnesses.
4.2.2. Rising Healthcare Costs
Global health expenditures on pollution-related diseases reached $2.5 trillion in 2023, particularly in highly urbanized regions.
EU health costs from pollution-related conditions exceed €650 billion annually (EEA, 2023).
Figure 5. Healthcare Expenditures Due to Pollution-Related Diseases (2014-2024)
In India
4.3. Policy Implications and Solutions
Market-Based Approaches:
Carbon pricing mechanisms (e.g., EU’s Emission Trading System) have reduced pollution but need wider adoption.
The polluter-pays principle has been effective in reducing industrial emissions in Nordic countries.
Investment in Clean Energy and Technology:
Transitioning to renewable energy could prevent 2.8 million pollution-related deaths annually while boosting green jobs.
China and India invested over $170 billion in clean energy in 2023 to reduce coal dependency.
5. Conclusion
The economic slowdown caused by pollution-related health costs is a growing global concern. Rising healthcare expenditures, workforce productivity losses, and environmental degradation are costing the global economy trillions of dollars annually. Effective policy interventions, including stricter emissions regulations, carbon pricing, and investments in renewable energy, are crucial for mitigating these economic and health burdens. Governments and industries must prioritize sustainability to ensure long-term economic resilience while improving public health outcomes.
6. References
European Environment Agency. (2023). Economic Impact of Air Pollution in Europe.
Fossil fuel air pollution responsible for 1 in 5 deaths worldwide,ByAnna Miller,February 9, 2021.
Fossil fuel air pollution responsible for 1 in 5 deaths worldwide
Harvard University. (2022). The Cost of Fossil Fuel-Related Air Pollution in the U.S.
OECD. (2023). Global Economic Implications of Air Pollution: 2023 Report.
The Economic Consequences of Outdoor Air Pollution,Report, 9 June 2016
https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/the-economic-consequences-of-outdoor-air-pollution_9789264257474-en.html#:~:text=This%20report%20provides%20a%20comprehensive,substantial%20annual%20global%20welfare%20costs.
The Lancet Commission on Pollution and Health. (2018). Pollution and Economic Development.
Review,Volume 6, Issue 6e535-e547June 2022,Pollution and health: a progress update,Richard Fuller, BEnga richfuller@gahp.net ∙ Prof Philip J Landrigan, MDb ∙ Kalpana Balakrishnan, PhDd ∙ Glynda Bathan, LLBe ∙ Stephan Bose-O’Reilly, MDf ∙ Prof Michael Brauer, ScDg∙ et al.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(22)00090-0/fulltext
National and provincial burden of disease attributable to fine particulate matter air pollution in China, 1990–2021: an analysis of data from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021,The Lancet Planetary HealthVol. 9No. 3e174–e185Published: March, 2025 ,Tanchun YuYixuan JiangRenjie ChenPeng YinHuihuan LuoMaigeng Zhouand others
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(25)00024-5/fulltext
Environmental Research
Author links open overlay panel
Baifeng Zheng ,Jiayi ChenQiu Zhang.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0013935124022990
WHO. (2023). Air Quality and Health: Economic Costs and Policy Responses.
https://www.who.int/health-topics/air-pollution#tab=tab_1
Economy and air pollution
Exposure & health impacts of air pollution
https://www.who.int/teams/environment-climate-change-and-health/air-quality-energy-and-health/health-impacts/exposure-air-pollution#:~:text=Combined%20Ambient%20and%20Household%20Air,cancer%20and%20acute%20respiratory%20infections.
World Bank. (2024). The Economic Impact of Pollution-Related Health Issues in Developing Countries.
Europe’s air quality status 2023
https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/europes-air-quality-status-2023
Working paper:How much does Europe pay for clean air?.Miquel Oliu-Barton Juan Mejino-López,20 June 2024.
https://www.bruegel.org/working-paper/how-much-does-europe-pay-clean-air