IISPPR

Category: Sustainable Cities and Communities

Sustainable Cities and Communities
Saif Ullah Khan

The Circular Economy: Minimized Waste, Maximized Efficiency

The Circular Economy: Minimized Waste, Maximized Efficiency   ABSTRACT The circular economy is a transformative approach aimed at minimizing waste and maximizing efficiency by reusing, recycling, and remanufacturing materials. It contrasts with the current linear economy, which leads to overconsumption and environmental degradation. Based on three core principles—eliminating waste, circulating products, and regenerating nature—it promotes sustainability and economic growth. Recent innovations, such as waterless dyeing and artificial intelligence, enhance circular processes by improving product design, optimizing resource use, and reducing waste. The circular economy presents a pathway to significant environmental and economic benefits, unlocking trillions in value while addressing global challenges like climate change. INTRODUCTION The circular economy represents a transformative shift in how we produce, consume, and manage resources. It emphasizes the continuous use of materials and products through methods like refurbishment, reuse, recycling, and remanufacturing, effectively reducing waste and promoting sustainability. Underpinned by a transition to renewable energy and materials, the circular economy is designed to create a more resilient system that benefits businesses, people, and the environment. In this essay, we will explore the core principles of the circular economy, its benefits, and its integration with emerging technologies like artificial intelligence (AI), supported by data and evidence. The Problem with the Current Linear Economy Today’s global economy largely operates on a linear model of production and consumption, commonly referred to as a “take-make-dispose” system. In this model, resources are extracted, used to make products, and then discarded as waste after their use. This system is unsustainable due to its heavy reliance on finite resources, such as fossil fuels and metals, and its contribution to environmental degradation. According to the World Bank, global waste generation is expected to increase by 70% from 2016 levels by 2050, reaching 3.4 billion tons annually . This increase in waste is driven by rapid urbanization, population growth, and overconsumption, particularly in developed countries. The linear economy’s reliance on wasteful production processes has contributed to significant environmental issues, including climate change, loss of biodiversity, and pollution. The Circular Economy: Principles and Approach The circular economy offers an alternative to the wasteful linear model by focusing on three key principles: Eliminating Waste and Pollution Circulating Products and Materials Regenerating Natural Systems These principles guide a shift from a consumption-based, resource-intensive economy to one that prioritizes sustainability, efficiency, and environmental responsibility. Elimination of Waste and Pollution The first principle of the circular economy aims to eliminate waste and pollution by rethinking how products are designed and how production processes are structured. In a circular system, waste is viewed not as an inevitable byproduct of consumption but as a design flaw. Products are developed to minimize their environmental impact, from materials sourcing to end-of-life disposal. One prime example of waste reduction in action is the waterless dyeing technology pioneered by DyeCoo, a Dutch company that has developed a system that eliminates the need for water in textile dyeing. The textile industry is one of the most water-intensive sectors globally, with traditional dyeing processes consuming an estimated 79 billion cubic meters of water annually. DyeCoo’s waterless technology eliminates water usage, reduces energy consumption, and eliminates the need for harmful chemicals, helping to combat one of the most polluting aspects of the fashion industry. Circulation of Products and Materials The second principle of the circular economy focuses on keeping materials and products in circulation for as long as possible. This involves designing products that are durable, repairable, and easy to disassemble. When products can no longer serve their original purpose, their components or materials are recycled or repurposed for new uses, reducing the need for virgin resources and minimizing waste. According to the Ellen MacArthur Foundation, adopting circular economy principles in the EU alone could lead to a reduction in carbon emissions by up to 48% by 2030 and a decrease in material costs by €600 billion per year. Circular strategies such as remanufacturing and refurbishment allow industries to retain the value of materials and products by extending their life cycles. For instance, companies like Caterpillar and Rolls-Royce have embraced circularity by offering remanufacturing programs for heavy machinery and jet engines, respectively, ensuring that parts and materials are reused instead of discarded. Regeneration of Nature Beyond waste elimination and material circulation, the circular economy also emphasizes the need to regenerate natural systems. This principle recognizes that the economy and the environment are interconnected, and that businesses should not only minimize their negative impact on the planet but actively contribute to the restoration of natural ecosystems. In practical terms, this means using renewable resources, protecting biodiversity, and adopting regenerative agriculture practices that improve soil health and sequester carbon. The circular economy can significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions by optimizing the use of resources and shifting towards renewable energy sources. A study by the International Resource Panel suggests that a circular economy could reduce global carbon emissions by up to 72% by 2050, particularly in industries like cement, steel, plastic, and aluminum. Economic and Environmental Benefits The economic benefits of transitioning to a circular economy are substantial. According to the World Economic Forum, adopting circular practices could unlock $4.5 trillion in economic benefits by 2030. Circular business models create opportunities for innovation, cost savings, and new revenue streams. For example, IKEA, a global leader in home furnishings, has committed to becoming fully circular by 2030. This includes designing products for reuse and recycling, using renewable and recycled materials, and offering furniture take-back services. Environmental benefits are equally impressive. The European Environment Agency estimates that circular economy strategies could reduce Europe’s greenhouse gas emissions by 56% by 2050. By reducing waste, conserving resources, and minimizing pollution, the circular economy supports the goals of international climate agreements, such as the Paris Agreement. The Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Circular Economy One of the most exciting recent developments in the circular economy is the integration of artificial intelligence (AI). AI has the potential to optimize circular processes, enabling businesses to design more sustainable products, improve resource efficiency, and implement circular business

Read More »

Why is the circular economy the need of the hour? Incorporating Reduce, Reuse, Recycle in daily lives:

In today’s world, usage of resources sustainably is utmost important. In a situation where people below poverty line live on a meagre wage of $2.15 dollars, it is important that we know how to “reduce, reuse, recycle” our resources. SDG 12 or Sustainable Development Goal 12 deals with reduction of waste production and ensures sustainable consumption and production patterns for the society. Each stage of production or manufacturing presents an opportunity to reduce resource and fossil fuel use, foster innovation, conserve energy, cut emissions, and advocate for a circular economy approach. The question may arise that why achieving this goal is important? Our planet is running out of resources, but populations are continuing to grow. If the global population reaches 9.8 billion by 2050, the equivalent of almost three planets will be required to provide the natural resources needed to sustain current lifestyles.We need to change our consumption habits, and shifting our energy supplies to more sustainable ones is one of the main changes we must make if we are going to reduce our consumption levels. However, global crises triggered a resurgence in fossil fuel subsidies, nearly doubling from 2020 to 2021. Goal 12 targets:- Target 12.1: From 2019 to 2023, one-third of member states (63 countries) have reported 516 policy instruments related to sustainable consumption and production. Target 12.2: From 2015 to 2022, Domestic Material Consumption (DMC) increased by 5.8%, and Material Footprint (MF) rose by 6.8%. Regional disparities between DMC and MF continue to grow, particularly between regions where MF is higher than DMC (Eastern and South-Eastern Asia, Europe and Northern America, Northern Africa and Western Asia) and those where MF is lower than DMC (Central and Southern Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean, Sub-Saharan Africa, Oceania), showing different patterns of material consumption and their corresponding environmental impact. Target 12.3: In 2022, 19% of global food was wasted, totalling 1.05 billion tonnes, with household waste accounting for 60%. This waste generates significant greenhouse gas emissions, costing over $1 trillion annually, while 783 million people suffer from hunger. Addressing this issue is crucial for halving food waste by 2030, yet only 9 out of 193 countries have included food waste in their Nationally Determined Contributions as of 2022. Meanwhile, the percentage of food lost globally after harvest on farm, transport, storage, wholesale, and processing levels is estimated at 13.2% in 2021. Target 12.4: Number of parties to international multilateral environmental agreements on hazardous waste, and other chemicals that meet their commitments and obligations in transmitting information as required by each relevant agreement: Targets 12.4 and 12.5: In 2022, e-waste generation rose to 7.8 kg per capita from 6.2 kg per capita in 2015, but only 1.7 kg per capita was properly managed. Mismanaged e-waste leads to resource loss, increased use of virgin resources, and environmental hazards, underscoring the urgency for improved and environmentally sound management. Target 12.6: In 2021-2022, 73% of companies included in the sample published sustainability reports, with the number of companies tripling since 2016. This growth was observed in all regions in 2022. Target 12.c: Fossil fuel subsidies hit a record high of $1.53 trillion in 2022, reversing the declining trend observed from 2012 to 2020. The post-COVID energy price surge inflated these subsidies, prompting some governments to introduce new support measures. Consequently, public funding for oil, coal, and gas production and consumption more than doubled from 2021 to 2022 and tripled since 2015, impeding progress towards net-zero transition. What is a circular economy? A circular economy, sometimes known as circularity or CE, is a model of resource production and consumption in any economy that emphasises extending the life of current materials and products through sharing, leasing, reusing, repairing, and refurbishing them. In order to address global issues including pollution, waste, biodiversity loss, and climate change, the concept emphasises the model’s three guiding principles being implemented design-based. To shift towards a circular economy, three key concepts need to be followed: minimising waste and pollution, extending the life of products and resources, and restoring natural systems.In contrast to the conventional linear economy, CE is specified. Circular economy and its relation with SDG 12: Circular economies, or CEs, are seen to offer potential solutions to issues including the rising demand for resources worldwide, price fluctuation for raw materials, as well as rising consumption and population globally.(Alonso-Almeida and Rodriguez-Anton,2019). The circular economy (CE) is a transformative concept aimed at transitioning from the traditional “take-make-dispose” linear economy to a more sustainable model. It emphasises minimising waste, enhancing resource efficiency, and promoting the recycling and reuse of materials. This model is designed to achieve long-term environmental, economic, and social benefits. CE directly supports several of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as those related to responsible consumption, production (SDG 12), and poverty eradication (SDG 1). (Khalid, A. M., Sharma, S., & Dubey, A. K,2018, August).One critical area where CE is particularly important is in addressing the issue of plastic waste management. Plastic waste (PW) has become one of the fastest-growing segments of municipal waste globally, with serious environmental consequences. As highlighted by Hossain et al. (2022), only about 9% of plastic waste is recycled, with the vast majority ending up in landfills or the natural environment. The circular economy offers solutions by promoting the reuse of plastics and improving recycling technologies (Hossain, R., Islam, M. T., Shanker, R., Khan, D., Locock, K. E. S., Ghose, A., … & Sahajwalla, V ,2022).Furthermore, the CE model helps tackle the depletion of natural resources by advocating for closed-loop systems. The report by the Finnish Environment Institute (2018) stresses that businesses adopting circular practices can reduce their dependency on raw materials, lower production costs, and contribute to sustainability. In essence, CE can drive innovation while mitigating environmental damage by reducing resource extraction and waste generation. However, structural adjustments to laws, rules, and business models are necessary for the effective use of CE. For example, as the Finnish report discusses, policies that promote sustainable patterns of production and consumption must be incorporated into

Read More »
Sustainable Cities and Communities
Debolina Bhattacharyya

Socio-cultural Education, Corporate Responsibility and Government Regulations: Fostering Community-focused Ecotourism in the Indian Himalayan Region

This article explores sustainable ecotourism in the Indian Himalayan Region and presents policy recommendations to improve ecotourism practices, ensuring community welfare and cultural preservation. It promotes local empowerment and responsible travel to preserve Himalayan heritage through community-based tourism (CBT), corporate responsibility, and education.

Read More »
Sustainable Cities and Communities
Yogita Dhall

ECO-URBANISM: DESIGNING CITIES FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE

Imagine a striking visual of an ecology city: sleek skyscrapers adorned with vertical gardens, their green facades blending seamlessly with the azure sky. Streets are alive with cyclists and solar-powered buses, while vibrant parks burst with flora and fauna. A gleaming river snakes through, mirroring the city’s balance of technology and nature—a living symbol of harmony and sustainability.

Read More »
Sustainable Cities and Communities
Neal Bharadwaj

The Urban Future with Green Development

Writer: Neal Bharadwaj Sustainable development, one of the lynchpins that have come under the tangent of urban growth, catalyzed by a host of challenges, the larger part of which emanates from rapid urbanization and climate change. Cities, courtesy of their populace that has driven major growth in most countries, have been majorly considered in engaging with SDGs. The paper is going to discuss strategies and solutions while dealing with urban area sustainable development from three dimensions, namely, environmental, economic, and social. It reflects on different ways of planning and developing cities that support the sustainable future, with the city-based case studies of Copenhagen, Curitiba, and Singapore. Introduction  It calls for the building of livable cities that are resilient and supportive of existing and future generations. From reducing carbon emissions to making economies more vital and fostering social equity, it ranges from everything. In this regard, cities such as Copenhagen, Singapore, and many others have led quite a remarkable path in the field of sustainable urbanism, carrying on with important lessons of how the many opposing objectives can be balanced. This article, therefore, discusses some of the central sustainability strategies adopted by these cities and what it means in terms of urban planning and development. Key Strategies and Remedies Talking about sustainable cities, one knows they require nothing less than the best solutions to be put into place with innovation and creativity. These can therefore be elaborated under three broad categorizations: environmental sustainability, economic sustainability, and social sustainability. Environmental Sustainability: In essence, it is on the management of natural resources and reduction in environmental impacts within the city. The ambitious goals set by the city of Copenhagen are to be carbon-neutral no later than 2025, using a mix of variable renewable energy sources, efficient building design, and sustainably managed transport systems. Some of the more basic strategies are: Renewable energy The town invested in renewable energies such as solar, wind, and bioenergy. For example, in the case of Copenhagen, investments were made in wind farms and district heating installations, intending to reduce the consumption of fossil fuel. These support mechanisms by cities can range from the provision of simple green open space, parklands, and urban forestry to supplying green roofs and walls in heat islands, managing storm water, and improving air quality. For instance, Gardens by the Bay in Singapore have been designed to raise biodiversity and improve the quality of life for city dwellers through integrated use of greens. This proves that sustainable mobility—that is cycling, walking, and public transport use—reduces dependence on private mobility and, therefore, emissions. The precedent set by bus rapid transit in Curitiba realized the dream that a well-managed public transport system could offer improvement in mobility in cities at the same time as reducing congestion. Economic Sustainability: Long-term economic growth should also involve little environmental degradation and social exclusion. This might perhaps be realized within cities where there is diversified economic activity, innovation, and smart governance. The key strategies are contained in: Mixed-use development: Residential, business, and industries locate close to each other. This realization allows for local economic development without the necessity for long-distance travels for economic agents. It results in the incentives toward walkability and neighborhood levels of business activities in accordance with the compact city model, such as Barcelona model, for example. Green Economy: Investments in green technologies and industries contribute partly to the goals of the green economy to be attained by creating jobs which trigger economic activities. Cities such as Freiburg in Germany target the aspects of originality, creativity, and through the promotion of renewable energies and building green industries, there is the realization of sustainable economic growth. Mobilization of the required resources and expertise by the governments and businesses that make partnerships with civil societies on sustainable urban projects. The URA in Singapore is working together with the private developers to implement more green building and smart city technologies, which can further strengthen the building of economic resilience. Social Sustainability: Social sustainability means communities that are inclusive, just, and cohesive in their nature. It is catered by giving its basics such as accessibility, social inclusion, and belonging to the same community. Some of the strategies in the same direction include: Affordable housing should, therefore, be socioeconomically diversified in order to avoid segregation in housing and as a way to chip in on social equity. Probably the best example is Vienna’s social housing, which is good quality yet really affordable, ranging across classes from all walks of life. Community Involvement: The participation of residents in decision-making processes engenders social capital and ownership in them. The participatory planning processes of programs and projects in a community help in shaping cities like Porto Alegre, Brazil, which are cohesive and resilient. Public Space that is Inclusive: All designs of the public space consider the factor of access and hence are inclusive for one and all. Interaction amongst people invites themselves to be involved in community building. High Line, New York City-public park built from an elevated rail-is a social space of dynamism, attracts diverse groups and eventually leads to community building.  Conclusion Sustainable development is the complex; burdened process of comprehensive planning and development of urban settlements. Developing cities to be more resilient, liveable, and inclusive is sustainable design in this light. All this explains that, indeed, sustainable urbanism is not an off-the-shelf solution; rather, it requires tailored strategies reflecting local context and needs. Cross-city learning from one another and models of public-private partnership give such pointers to undertake sustainable urban development in the world’s countries. It is that which will mark the need for original thought and increasing cooperation of all toward working for sustainable urban futures. Putting the concept of sustainability into the agendas will smooth the needs of the citizens today and ensure that further generations down the line will be in for a future brighter and safer than at present. Sources: https://kk.sites.itera.dk/apps/kk_pub2/pdf/983_jk1dWBWkPP.pdf https://www.gardensbythebay.com.sg . https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800905002871  https://www.ura.gov.sg             https://www.thehighline.org

Read More »